Assessing the Effect of a Crop-Tree Intercropping Program on Smallholders’ Incomes in Rural Xinjiang, China

Abstract

Governments in developing counties often promote intercropping (crops intercropped with fruit trees on cultivated land) schemes in order to improve smallholders' income. However, the implementation of such schemes is often hindered by inappropriate institutional environments and inefficient project management. It is important to assess the impacts of such intercropping programs, especially since such a cultivation strategy can often align closely with smallholders' livelihood strategies, particularly in poor and remote rural regions. This paper attempts to assess the impact of an intercropping program on participants' incomes in rural Xinjiang (China), and to explore the possible shortcomings in the program's design and implementation. We apply a propensity score matching method, based on a survey dataset of 352 households, supplemented with descriptive analysis based on our anecdotal field observations. The findings demonstrate that the intercropping program had negative effects on the incomes that participants derived from farming, their off-farm income and their gross income. Overall, participants experienced significant losses of income. Anecdotal observations show that land tenure insecurity played a crucial role in negating the anticipated income improvement effect of this program. Farmer's perceptions that they have limited security of tenure made them reluctant to invest the necessary time and resources to make the new cropping systems a success, while the available subsidies only partially covered the costs involved. In addition, the program led to a significant drop in yields of field crops as the trees were competing for a limiting and fixed supply of irrigation water.

Synergies and Determinants of Sustainable Intensification Practices in Pakistani Agriculture

“…Meanwhile, as expected, the experience of farmers was significantly associated with organic manure. Moreover, a household's education level was an important determinant of intercropping and low tillage [59]. Farmers' willingness to take risks affected the adoption of intercropping significantly and positively.…”

The impacts of agroforestry interventions on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well‐being in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review

“…Under this scenario, when agroforestry interventions are introduced and individuals adopt agroforestry practices, the practices lead to improved yields and income generation as well as ecosystem service generation.Under this pathway, three key elements, participant engagement, program exposure, and indirect financial support, lead to agroforestry adoption, which is then intended to lead to positive productivity, profitability, and human well-being outcomes through diversified production and income streams, improved soil fertility, and other changes. The promoted practices are simultaneously supposed to lead to improved ecosystem services outcomes, such as soil and water management, soil fertility replenishment, habitat provision, and carbon sequestration.,,,Thorlakson and Neufeldt (2012),Dai et al (2017),Sills and Caviglia-Harris (2015), and examined interventions along this pathway. The studied interventions tended to lead to increased food security through improved yields or dietary diversity.…”

Radiation Dynamics on Crop Productivity in Different Cropping Systems

“…Intercropping allows farmers to stabilize their incomes as they can benefit from the main crops and other component crops [10,12]. Besides, it also ensures the farmer's higher return over time [13].…”