2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15409-7_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Key Factors Impacting the Adoption and Use of Tethered Electronic Personal Health Records for Health Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before mentioning these motivators and barriers in details it can be clustered and classified into higher categories, Showell defined these categories as demographic, capabilities, health related, PHR related and attitudinal factors (Showell, 2017), it has been categorized also as personal factors, human-technology interaction factors, organizational factors and social factors (Abd-alrazaq et al, 2019a). (Alzahrani & Daim, 2019) presented a potential classification to the factors affecting adoption of tethered ePHR into seven main categories including the determinants of patients' intention to use ePHR for self-management in the below figure 2.20 (Alzahrani & Daim, 2019). Alzahrani & Daim mentioned the most related factors to the case of tethered ePHR which might be relevant to study in the case of standalone ePHR, the following section will discuss some of the important factors that can be relevant to the current research context in Egypt.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Adoption Of Ephrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Before mentioning these motivators and barriers in details it can be clustered and classified into higher categories, Showell defined these categories as demographic, capabilities, health related, PHR related and attitudinal factors (Showell, 2017), it has been categorized also as personal factors, human-technology interaction factors, organizational factors and social factors (Abd-alrazaq et al, 2019a). (Alzahrani & Daim, 2019) presented a potential classification to the factors affecting adoption of tethered ePHR into seven main categories including the determinants of patients' intention to use ePHR for self-management in the below figure 2.20 (Alzahrani & Daim, 2019). Alzahrani & Daim mentioned the most related factors to the case of tethered ePHR which might be relevant to study in the case of standalone ePHR, the following section will discuss some of the important factors that can be relevant to the current research context in Egypt.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Adoption Of Ephrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in table 1 , these studies from different contexts, countries and cultures assures that the perception of the usefulness and benefit of ePHR is a strong motivator for the intention to use by adults and needs to be studied as well in Egyptian context. Perceived ease of use usability of PHR is considered an essential determinant in the adoption process (Alzahrani & Daim, 2019). While reviewing the literature it was found that usability of ePHR has been tested in several studies using two variables which are perceived ease of use adapted from TAM and effort expectancy adapted from UTAUT.…”
Section: Perceived Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following up with the newly available guidelines (named Stage 2 meaningful use) that were issued by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, health-care organizations must not only implement patient portals but they must also determine how effectively patients use them (Tavares et al, 2018). Two main components of TAM (PU and PEOU) are important to consider when investigating the patient's perspective toward the e-health system usage (Al-Gahtani, 2011; Alzahrani and Daim, 2019). PU refers to the extent to which a patient believes that using the portal will enhance his or her task performance (Venkatesh, 2000).…”
Section: Assessing Patient Readinessmentioning
confidence: 99%