Assessing the performance of structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry and terrestrial LiDAR for reconstructing soil surface microtopography of naturally vegetated plots

Abstract

Soil microtopography is a property of critical importance in many earth surface processes but is often difficult to quantify. Advances in computer vision technologies have made image‐based three‐dimensional (3D) reconstruction or Structure‐from‐Motion (SfM) available to many scientists as a low cost alternative to laser‐based systems such as terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). While the performance of SfM at acquiring soil surface microtopography has been extensively compared to that of TLS on bare surfaces, little is known about the impact of vegetation on reconstruction performance. This article evaluates the performance of SfM and TLS technologies at reconstructing soil microtopography on 6 m × 2 m erosion plots with vegetation cover ranging from 0% to 77%. Results show that soil surface occlusion by vegetation was more pronounced with TLS compared to SfM, a consequence of the single viewpoint laser scanning strategy adopted in this study. On the bare soil surface, elevation values estimated with SfM were within 5 mm of those from TLS although long distance deformations were observed with the former technology. As vegetation cover increased, agreement between SfM and TLS slightly degraded but was significantly affected beyond 53% of ground cover. Detailed semivariogram analysis on meter‐square‐scale surface patches showed that TLS and SfM surfaces were very similar even on highly vegetated plots but with fine scale details and the dynamic elevation range smoothed out with SfM. Errors in the TLS data were mainly caused by the distance measurement function of the instrument especially at the fringe of occlusion regions where the laser beam intersected foreground and background features simultaneously. From this study, we conclude that a realistic approach to digitizing soil surface microtopography in field conditions can be implemented by combining strengths of the image‐based method (simplicity and effectiveness at reconstructing soil surface under sparse vegetation) with the high accuracy of TLS‐like technologies. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry – merits, limits and developments

“…for multi-temporal assessments. For instance, at plot and hillslope scale, 3-D reconstruction is a very sufficient method for soil erosion studies, even outperforming TLS (Nouwakpo et al, 2015;Smith and Vericat, 2015). The method should be most useful in small-scale study reaches (Fonstad et al, 2013), whereas error behaviour is not as advantageous for larger scales, i.e.…”

Examination of the Potential of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry for Rapid Nondestructive Field Measurement of Grass Biomass

“…The primary application of SfM has been on the analysis of topography [28,29] and man-made features [30,31]. Improved digital camera technology and computing capabilities enable rapid SfM implementation.…”

Amplification factors to estimate wind erosion of piles of soil with different heights: Numerical simulation and structure-from-motion photogrammetry verification

“…Although the powerful SfM method has been applied to a wide range of geoscience research, such as gully water erosion, ice surface research, and landform evolution (Cook 2017;James and Robson 2012;Nouwakpo et al 2016;Prosdocimi et al 2017; Smith et al. 2016;Stöcker et al 2015), this is the first time it is used in the wind erosion field to our knowledge.…”

“…Although the powerful SfM method has been applied to a wide range of geoscience research, such as gully water erosion, ice surface research, and landform evolution (Cook 2017;James and Robson 2012;Nouwakpo et al 2016;Prosdocimi et al 2017;Smith et al 2016;Stöcker et al 2015), this is the first time it is used in the wind erosion field to our knowledge. Neither the numerical simulations in the previous section nor the field measurements in this section could consider a wide range of pile parameters, and we want to check if the proposed factor can reflect the general trend of the influence of pile heights on wind erosion instead of specific erosion values.…”