2017
DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2017.1385798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the potential use of two portable chlorophyll meters in diagnosing the nutritional status of plants

Abstract: The SPAD-502 and the FieldScout CM 1000 chlorophyll meters were compared in their performance in diagnosing the nutritional status of plants.Leaves of a wide range of greenness were used to push the sensitivity of the tools to their limits. Both devices showed high reproducibility when used by different operators. The SPAD-readings were well-correlated with leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations, since leaves from heavily fertilized plants were not included in the sample population. The FieldScout-readings showed a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These variations in tissue nutrient concentrations were probably the result of dilution and concentration effects, which have been well-known for a long time [34], and/or antagonism and synergism in plant nutrient uptake [35]. SPAD and NDVI usually provide a good indication of the greenness of the leaves and general plant health [36,37]. In this study, however, only NDVI values were associated with the most productive plots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These variations in tissue nutrient concentrations were probably the result of dilution and concentration effects, which have been well-known for a long time [34], and/or antagonism and synergism in plant nutrient uptake [35]. SPAD and NDVI usually provide a good indication of the greenness of the leaves and general plant health [36,37]. In this study, however, only NDVI values were associated with the most productive plots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Red-edge spectral reflectance is associated with higher sampling resolution as it is relatively easily affected (strongly controlled) by chlorophyll concentration change compared to the red spectral reflectance [ 39 ]. In addition, NDVI data distributions show saturation towards higher reading values [ 47 ], and this can decrease the model performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shafian et al [ 46 ] evaluated the performance of an Unmanned Aerial Systems-based remote sensing system for quantification of crop growth parameters of sorghum LAI, fractional vegetation cover (fc) and yield. In their work to assess the potential use of portable SPAD-502 and the FieldScout CM 1000 NDVI meters in diagnosing the nutritional status of plants, Afonso et al [ 47 ] concluded that although both devices showed good reproducibility, the FieldScout NDVI readings showed a marked saturation curve with the leaf nitrogen concentration, and was thus considered not suited for reliable use as nitrogen nutritional status index. Using RapidEye images and in situ data from alfa-alfa, barley, maize and winter wheat, Xie et al [ 39 ] proposed three improved indices combining reflectance both in the red and red-edge spectral regions into the NDVI, the modified simple ratio index (MSR), and the green chlorophyll index formula for LAI retrieval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on many crops have observed an enhanced radiation interception to be directly related to improved uptake of soil N when soil moisture was not limiting (Andersen, Heidmann, & Plauborg, ; Oppong Danso et al, ; Zhou, Plauborg, Thomsen, & Andersen, ). Although we did not determine crop N uptake in the present study, the LCC is usually taken as a surrogate measure of the N content of crops due to the linear relation between the two (Afonso, Arrobas, Ferreira, & Rodrigues, ; Muchecheti, Madakadze, & Soundy, ). In line with this, the LCC in our study was significantly and linearly related to both TDMY and IPAR in both years with R 2 of 0.7 and 0.8 in 2017 and 0.5 and 0.8 in 2018 (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%