2016
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1125557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the sun glint effect on the data bias of CrIS shortwave surface channels near 3.7 μm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, we found that there was a sun glint effect in the short-wave range fr 2400 to 2500 cm −1 , but RTTOV did not simulate this effect, resulting in a large bias of O in these channels. Therefore, we deleted the observation samples affected by sun gl Sun glint effects are an important factor affecting the accuracy of radiometric calibrati Later, we will use cubic polynomial regression to correct the observation data [17,18 that the observation data can be used by global numerical prediction models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly, we found that there was a sun glint effect in the short-wave range fr 2400 to 2500 cm −1 , but RTTOV did not simulate this effect, resulting in a large bias of O in these channels. Therefore, we deleted the observation samples affected by sun gl Sun glint effects are an important factor affecting the accuracy of radiometric calibrati Later, we will use cubic polynomial regression to correct the observation data [17,18 that the observation data can be used by global numerical prediction models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun glint effects are an important factor affecting the accuracy of radiometric calibration. Later, we will use cubic polynomial regression to correct the observation data [17,18] so that the observation data can be used by global numerical prediction models. There are still some phenomena that we need to continue to improve in follow-up work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation