Assessing waste management efficiency in the European Union: A focus on the Slovak Republic

Abstract

Even though every country in the EU must follow the waste management hierarchy stipulated in Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, there are differences in how the member states manage their municipal waste. For example, the percentage of recyclable and incineration with energy recovery of municipal waste is among the lowest in the Slovak Republic (and the high amount of its disposal by landfilling). However, following the European Union legislation, several strategies in the Slovak Republic, such as the Waste Prevention Program 2019-2025, Waste Management Program 2021-2025, and Envirostrategy 2030, have been adopted. Based on these strategies, the recycling rate is scheduled to increase to 65% by 2035, and the percentage of municipal waste sent to landfills is planned to fall below 25%. These projections assume the successful implementation of the programs. As a result, the Slovak Republic’s waste is significantly lower than that of other member states. When investigating the efficiency of municipal waste management, we utilised partial treatment-specific indicators and a composite indicator based on an approach known as the multi-criteria decision-making method. The highest efficiency of municipal waste management in the EU-27 in 2021, expressed by the composite indicator, was achieved by Germany (0.630), and the lowest performance by Malta (0.188). For the evaluated period of 2017–2021, municipal waste management efficiency improved the most in Malta (+28.4%) and deteriorated the most in Denmark (-20.8%). The broader implications of our research have shown significant differences in partial treatment-specific indicators across the EU-27.

Time flies, waste piles: A bibliometric analysis of solid waste management research

“…Comprehending the growth of publications holds significance as it offers valuable insights into the present state of research, facilitates the assessment of the impact of research funding, and enables researchers to remain abreast of the latest advancements in their respective fields (Abdullah et al, 2023). The findings suggest that the rise in population and urbanisation has led to a surge in waste production (Gautam & Agrawal, 2021;Valenćiková & Fandel, 2023), thereby prompting a recent upsurge in research on solid waste management. The escalation in the number of publications concerning the detrimental consequences of waste on the environment and human health has become increasingly conspicuous.…”

“…Solid waste management is essential for maintaining the balance of ecological cycles that sustain life on Earth. Human is perilously close to numerous of the planet's boundaries, such as its ability to absorb waste, provide food and energy, and support an expanding population (Valenćiková & Fandel, 2023). Minimising waste and pollution can aid in preserving crucial natural resources such as water and energy (Deng et al, 2020).…”

The determinants of municipal solid waste management efficiency in EU countries

“…Therefore, the EU Member States should focus more on the efficient use of waste treatment expenditure in line with the priorities listed in the Directive (2008). Thus, the assessment of MSWM efficiency from the perspective of this document is fully justified and necessary (Valencikova & Fandel, 2007).…”

“…Lacko and Hajduova (2018) pointed out that measuring environmental efficiency is one of the key processes to improve the environment. Hence, the interest in MSWM efficiency has been increasing significantly in recent years (Valencikova & Fandel, 2007). The vast majority of papers were focused not only on assessing MSWM efficiency but also on identifying the determinants of this efficiency.…”