1999
DOI: 10.1093/ije/28.2.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment methods for alcohol consumption, prevalence of high risk drinking and harm: a sensitivity analysis

Abstract: The characteristics of different measures of alcohol consumption should be considered in future research in epidemiology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
139
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
139
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the four items of the alcoholism scale, two -weekly drunkenness and excessive drinkingmay be related to pathological drinking, which is essential for the HRD definition. 20 Nevertheless, the values of the areas under the ROC curve (using DIS, diagnostic interviews schedule, as gold-standard) for alcohol abuse and dependence extracted by the principal components analysis were respectively 0.76 and 0.79, which provide a reasonable performance of the instrument if used for population research purposes. 4 Weak agreement at the level of diagnosis is a common feature of standard population research on the prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the four items of the alcoholism scale, two -weekly drunkenness and excessive drinkingmay be related to pathological drinking, which is essential for the HRD definition. 20 Nevertheless, the values of the areas under the ROC curve (using DIS, diagnostic interviews schedule, as gold-standard) for alcohol abuse and dependence extracted by the principal components analysis were respectively 0.76 and 0.79, which provide a reasonable performance of the instrument if used for population research purposes. 4 Weak agreement at the level of diagnosis is a common feature of standard population research on the prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These drinking patterns, graduated frequency of alcohol intake and case definition criteria are in convergence with current research on alcohol consumption and high-risk drinking. 7,20 …”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former often fails to capture periods of heavy drinking outside of 'usual' routine, whereas the latter is prone to missing infrequent drinkers. 17,18 In the GF method, quantity responses were given in decreasing ranges down the page (20+ standard drinks, 11-19 drinks etc. ), with frequency responses across the page starting with the most frequent (everyday, 5-6 days a week etc.).…”
Section: Quantity Consumed and Main Alcoholic Drinkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shortcomings of this method have been well documented elsewhere (e.g. Rehm et al 1999;Stockwell et al 2004;WHO 2000)-especially in relation to underestimated levels of consumption and numbers of episodic drinkers (i.e. binge drinkers).…”
Section: It Is Also Useful To Compare the 2002 Natsiss With The 2001 mentioning
confidence: 99%