2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Animal-Based Methods Used for Estimating and Monitoring Rangeland Herbivore Diet Composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Diet's dry matter digestibility was estimated for each grassland phenological stage through the botanical composition of the diet, which was estimated by the fecal microhistology procedure [37,38]. This technique is based on identifying vegetation epidermis fragments in the feces, which were then compared with the epidermis patterns previously obtained from the identified plant species collected in the study area [39][40][41].…”
Section: Diet's Dry Matter Digestibility (Dms Diet %)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diet's dry matter digestibility was estimated for each grassland phenological stage through the botanical composition of the diet, which was estimated by the fecal microhistology procedure [37,38]. This technique is based on identifying vegetation epidermis fragments in the feces, which were then compared with the epidermis patterns previously obtained from the identified plant species collected in the study area [39][40][41].…”
Section: Diet's Dry Matter Digestibility (Dms Diet %)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our solution was to extract cores around actual grazing targets of individual fish. Cores were analysed using microhistology (Garnick et al 2018), enabling prey items to be identified and quantified. Prey assemblages could then be compared to previous studies cataloging temporal changes in epilithic and endolithic coral reef successional communities (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspiration can be drawn from primate (Felton et al, 2009;Johnson et al, 2013) and ungulate (McShea and Schwede, 1993;Parker et al, 1996) research where the ability to habituate wild individuals to the presence of researchers provides the opportunity to determine detailed dietary intake from free-ranging animals. In addition, there are emerging opportunities for researchers to quantify intake of food through observations of animalborne video (Hays, 2015;Garnick et al, 2018) that could be coupled with remote sensors that detect forage species and Physiologically based models for herbivores phytochemical concentrations (Stolter et al, 2006;Yule et al, 2015;Lim et al, 2017) as well as environmental conditions (Faye et al, 2016;Cristóbal et al, 2018) at the same spatial and temporal scales. The next challenge is to then develop mechanistic models that can accommodate known concentrations of phytochemicals in body compartments (PBMs), and resulting fitness consequences (GF), as well as genetic and metagenomic data (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that coupling the manipulation of phytochemicals with the manipulation of host and microboime function would allow researchers to test model-predicted changes in a number of physiological and demographic parameters. Researchers could observe changes in intake of food of known phytochemistry through direct observations (McShea and Schwede, 1993;Parker et al, 1996;Felton et al, 2009;Johnson et al, 2013) or animal-borne video (Hays, 2015;Garnick et al, 2018). Fecal collections can be used to monitor changes in microbial communities from metagenomic studies and phytochemical exposure in the gut from metabolomic studies.…”
Section: In Vivo Manipulation To Test Demographic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%