2003
DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.2.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis

Abstract: Objective: To assess, firstly, the validity of the enthesis index published by Mander (Mander enthesis index (MEI)) and, secondly, to investigate whether it is possible to define a new enthesis index that is less time consuming to perform with at least similar or better properties. Methods: Data from the OASIS cohort, an international, longitudinal, observational study on outcome in ankylosing spondylitis, were used. In this study, measures of disease activity, including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
337
1
36

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 590 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
337
1
36
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence and severity of dactylitis were scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0 ϭ no dactylitis and 3 ϭ severe dactylitis, in each digit of the hands and feet. Enthesitis was assessed using the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) index (15), modified for PsA to include plantar fascia, with scores of 0-15.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence and severity of dactylitis were scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0 ϭ no dactylitis and 3 ϭ severe dactylitis, in each digit of the hands and feet. Enthesitis was assessed using the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) index (15), modified for PsA to include plantar fascia, with scores of 0-15.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was great variability in assessing these domains, with 12 and 6 different instruments used to assess enthesitis and dactylitis, respectively. The simple evaluation for the presence of enthesitis or entheseal pain was the most utilized instrument for assessing enthesitis (n ϭ 6 [10.3%]), followed by the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (97) and the presence of enthesitis in the feet and heels, both reported in 5 articles (8.6%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary variables analyzed at week 12 and through week 52 included total enthesitis count (0–35), the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (0–13) 28, the Spondyloarthritis Canadian Research Consortium Enthesitis Index (0–16) 29, tender joint count (TJC; 0–72), swollen joint count (SJC; 0–68), number of joints with LOM (0–66), presence of dactylitis (0–20), patient's assessment of total back pain (0–100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]), parent's assessment of patient's pain (0–100 mm VAS), physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA, 0–100 mm VAS), 50% improvement in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 30, and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30 (Pedi 30), 50, 70, and 90 responses 31. The percent change in AJC from baseline through week 52 was also analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%