2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of marine benthic diatom communities: insights from a combined morphological–metabarcoding approach in Mediterranean shallow coastal waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical contaminants found in our cultures were heterotrophic flagellated or amoeboid protists and green algae. Particular attention was paid to heterotrophic chrysophytes, whose DNA is amplified by diatom-specific primers (Pérez-Burillo et al, 2022). Whenever con-taminations were detected, single diatom cells were once again isolated.…”
Section: Isolation Of Cells and Removal Of Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical contaminants found in our cultures were heterotrophic flagellated or amoeboid protists and green algae. Particular attention was paid to heterotrophic chrysophytes, whose DNA is amplified by diatom-specific primers (Pérez-Burillo et al, 2022). Whenever con-taminations were detected, single diatom cells were once again isolated.…”
Section: Isolation Of Cells and Removal Of Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, DNA sequences are crucially needed as references for DNA metabarcoding studies to investigate diatom biodiversity in environmental samples. This technique has proved to be a reliable method for studying species diversity and has shown to be a valuable addition to light microscope-based identifications (Kermarrec et al 2014;Zimmermann et al 2015;Mora et al 2019;Pérez-Burillo et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA metabarcoding methods have proven useful to investigate diversity of microbial communities and have been used for exploring biogeographic trends (Antich et al., 2022 ; Pitz et al., 2020 ; Šupraha et al., 2022 ). Advantages of metabarcoding over the traditional light microscopy methods for identifying and quantifying algal communities include cost, reproducibility (Kermarrec et al., 2013 ), detection of species that may be overlooked in morphological assessments due to their small size or rarity (Pérez‐Burillo et al., 2022 ), clear identification of some groups of microbes (especially when reproductive structures are lacking), and an increasing lack of taxonomists available for this work (Kahlert et al., 2012 ). Metabarcoding studies have found higher diversity than detected with morphological methods in studies of cyanobacteria (e.g., Li et al., 2019 ) and diatoms (e.g., Zimmermann et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%