2020
DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1781273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of morphometric characters to delimit species ofApolpiumChamberlin, 1930 (Pseudoscorpiones, Olpiidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We employed morphometric analyses to complement our morphology-based species validation step [ 125 ]. Morphometric approaches were successfully used in pseudoscorpion taxonomy to distinguish Ephippiochthonius Beier, 1930 (Chthoniidae) [ 46 ] and Apolpium Chamberlin, 1930 (Olpiidae) [ 126 ] species. In Chernetidae, multivariate morphometric techniques successfully detected morphological differentiation of three Lasiochernes Beier, 1932 species and highlighted the most reliable characters for their identification [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed morphometric analyses to complement our morphology-based species validation step [ 125 ]. Morphometric approaches were successfully used in pseudoscorpion taxonomy to distinguish Ephippiochthonius Beier, 1930 (Chthoniidae) [ 46 ] and Apolpium Chamberlin, 1930 (Olpiidae) [ 126 ] species. In Chernetidae, multivariate morphometric techniques successfully detected morphological differentiation of three Lasiochernes Beier, 1932 species and highlighted the most reliable characters for their identification [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were edited in Adobe Photoshop (v.25.1.0). Standard pseudoscorpion measurements (in mm) following Chamberlin (1930) and Romero-Ortiz, Flórez & Sarmiento (2020) were taken using a Leica M205 A stereomicroscope armed with a 0.63x (Leica 10450027) lens, Leica DMC4500 camera and Leica Application Suite X (v.3.7.5.24914) software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%