Assessment on the research trend of low-carbon energy technology investment: A bibliometric analysis

Yu, Hao; Wei, Yi‐Ming; Tang, Bao-Jun; Mi, Zhifu; Pan, Su-Yan

doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.129

Cited by 85 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Bibliometric analysis has been widely used to study the state of knowledge in the area of energy and environmental policy. Examples of bibliometric analysis in this space include the study of carbon markets (Du et al 2015), carbon taxes (Zhang et al 2016), climate policy modeling (Wei et al 2015), low-carbon energy technology investment (Yu et al 2016), climate change research (Haunschild et al 2016) and energy management strategies for hybrid electric vehicles (Zhang et al 2015).…”

Section: Overview Of Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography

Deng

Liang

Liu

et al. 2017

Environ. Res. Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The perceived inability of climate change mitigation goals alone to mobilize sufficient climate change mitigation efforts has, among other factors, led to growing research on the co-benefits of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study conducts a systematic review (SR) of the literature on the co-benefits of mitigating GHG emissions resulting in 1554 papers. We analyze these papers using bibliometric analysis, including a keyword co-occurrence analysis. We then iteratively develop and present a typology of co-benefits, mitigation sectors, geographic scope, and methods based on the manual double coding of the papers resulting from the SR. We find that the co-benefits from GHG mitigation that have received the largest attention of researchers are impacts on ecosystems, economic activity, health, air pollution, and resource efficiency. The co-benefits that have received the least attention include the impacts on conflict and disaster resilience, poverty alleviation (or exacerbation), energy security, technological spillovers and innovation, and food security. Most research has investigated co-benefits from GHG mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU), electricity, transport, and residential sectors, with the industrial sector being the subject of significantly less research. The largest number of co-benefits publications provide analysis at a global level, with relatively few studies providing local (city) level analysis or studying co-benefits in Oceanian or African contexts. Finally, science and engineering methods, in contrast to economic or social science methods, are the methods most commonly employed in co-benefits papers. We conclude that given the potential mobilizing power of understudied co-benefits (e.g. poverty alleviation) and local impacts, the magnitude of GHG emissions from the industrial sector, and the fact that Africa and South America are likely to be severely affected by climate change, there is an opportunity for the research community to fill these gaps.

show abstract

Section: Overview Of Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography

Deng

Liang

Liu

et al. 2017

Environ. Res. Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bibliometrics is an important field of information science and has been widely applied to many fields (e.g. Rafols et al ., ; Fahimnia et al ., ; Lin et al ., ; Yu et al ., ; Metse et al ., ). Despite the importance of the top five economics journals and that of bibliometric research, no bibliometric analysis of the latest publications in the top five economics journals has been published in the Google Scholar or SSCI databases as of May 2017 (the search terms [top journal bibliometric] were used in the topic field).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top Five Economics Journals During 2012–2016

Wei

2018

Journal of Economic Surveys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the top five economics journals during the period 2012–2016 and provides helpful insights into the document types, the distribution of country/territories, the distribution of institutions, the geographical distribution of authors, the most active authors and their research interests or fields, the co‐authorship network, and global/local cooperation. This paper also provides valuable information about the core historical references and the hottest new papers through co‐citation analysis and citation analysis. A co‐word analysis based on the keywords and thematic noun‐phrases in the titles and abstracts of the sample papers was used to explore the hot research topics in the top five journals (e.g. ‘price’, ‘game’, ‘consumption’, ‘income’, ‘international trade’, ‘employment’, ‘monetary policy’, ‘welfare effects’ and ‘developing countries’). In addition, a comparative keyword analysis was used to explore the differences in the directions and characteristics of each journal and the changes in research focuses between ‘new’ and ‘old’ studies. The analytical methods of this study differ from those of reviews or previous studies, and the results fill the gaps not covered by those works.

show abstract

“…With the aid of the bibliometrics, the review can present the future research trend, research hotspots, scientific collaborations, etc. At present, bibliometrics is widely used in the review of low-carbon electricity transition [18], low-carbon technology investment [19], and CCS technology evaluation [20,21]. Wang, et al [18] examined the characteristics of the literature on decarbonization in the power system from 1990 to 2016, and pointed out that low-carbon electricity transition has been highly concerned.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Wang, et al [18] examined the characteristics of the literature on decarbonization in the power system from 1990 to 2016, and pointed out that low-carbon electricity transition has been highly concerned. Based on the frequency analysis of keywords related to low-carbon technology investment, Yu, et al [19] found that renewable energy has received much attention, and CCS technology is an emerging low-carbon technology field receiving increasing attention. Karimi and Khalilpour [20] pointed out that research on CCS seems to be closely following the trend of international negotiations on mitigating climate change.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Carbon Capture and Storage Project Investment and Operational Decision-Making Based on Bibliometrics

Hou

Wang

et al. 2018

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research on carbon capture and storage (CCS) project planning and investment and operational decision-making can provide a reference for enterprises to invest in CCS and for policy-makers to formulate policies to promote CCS development. So what are the current research hotspots in this field and the gaps that still need to be further studied in the future? This paper reviews the research in the field by a bibliometric analysis. The results show that the research in this field first focus on cost analysis, followed by project investment evaluation, project planning (cost curve and pipeline network), and project operation. In particular, fossil fuel power plants, pipeline transportation, and oil fields are the most crucial objects in the three technical links of CCS projects, respectively. Policies, carbon pricing, and uncertainty in cost and benefits are factors that are mainly discussed in this field. The methods used for CCS project planning are cost curve model and optimization model. The real option approach is suitable for the evaluation of investment decision-making. The evaluation of operational decision is mostly based on optimization model. The future research directions can be summarized as five points: (1) continuously and systematically update the calculated costs in the current research to the unified price of the latest year; (2) calculate the cost curve from the perspective of emission sources; (3) expand the planning region of pipeline network to the country, continent, and even the entire world; (4) pay more attention to the investment assessment of the CCS project that may be implemented with low cost and high return; and (5) analyze the optimal operation mode of CCS in the low-load power system.Energies 2019, 12, 23 2 of 22 of global CO 2 emissions come from processes such as the combustion and processing of energy [8]. Therefore, reducing energy-related CO 2 emissions is a key measure to mitigate climate change.The need to address climate change has reached a global consensus [9]. Many countries have introduced regulatory policy schemes for carbon reduction [10]. Mitigating climate change can start from three aspects: (1) efficiency improvement, (2) replacing fossil fuels with low-carbon energy, and (3) capture and storage of CO 2 . Although improving energy efficiency is the fundamental way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by controlling growth in total energy demand, its potential for reducing emissions is gradually decreasing. The goal of developing low-carbon energy is to reduce emissions by reducing fossil fuel demand. However, the low-carbon energy development in some regions, especially in the low-carbon energy resource-poor regions, is not economically viable in the short term. In the foreseeable future, our world will still rely heavily on fossil energy [11].Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) technology is a potential approach for mitigating climate change. Overall schematic of carbon capture and storage concept is shown in Figure 1. CCS technology is the key means to achi...

show abstract

Assessment on the research trend of low-carbon energy technology investment: A bibliometric analysis

Cited by 85 publications

References 65 publications

Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography

Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top Five Economics Journals During 2012–2016

A Review of Carbon Capture and Storage Project Investment and Operational Decision-Making Based on Bibliometrics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About