2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asset trading under non-classical ambiguity and heterogeneous beliefs

Abstract: We propose discrete time asset trading framework based on quantum probability formalism that represents well the ambiguity of agents in respect to the fundamental values and price states of the traded assets. Divergence of beliefs alike classical finance frameworks (e.g. works by Harrison and Kreps, 1978 [24]; Scheinkman and Xiong, 2003 [50]) produces different expectations of agents about the future price distribution of the traded risky asset. The model accounts for the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the choice of a correct probability measure such that a derivative contract is priced correctly is a subjective and quantitative exercise. In any case, no perfect model exists [42][43][44][45][46]. As a result, participants in financial markets are free to choose whichever probability model they calibrate to market data [47][48][49].…”
Section: Knightian Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the choice of a correct probability measure such that a derivative contract is priced correctly is a subjective and quantitative exercise. In any case, no perfect model exists [42][43][44][45][46]. As a result, participants in financial markets are free to choose whichever probability model they calibrate to market data [47][48][49].…”
Section: Knightian Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the findings of behavioural finance, the QP dynamical framework aims to show the mechanism of bubble formation from the contextual beliefs of agents. The idea of investors' nonclassical beliefs under ambiguity is further developed in [34] whereby the agents can be categorized according to the type of their ambiguity attitude. In line with some earlier works on asset trading under heterogeneous beliefs, agents can behave over-optimistically under informational ambiguity, or show ambiguity aversion through pessimistic beliefs about asset prices.…”
Section: Qp Contributions To Ambiguity Sensitive Behaviour In Economi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the search for a different theory of probability that could serve as a more general descriptive framework to accommodate context sensitivity of beliefs and preferences, quantum probability (QP) that is based on operational representation of beliefs in a linear vector space, started to be widely explored in decision theory and its applications to psychology, politics, economics, game theory and finance, see some contributions by [1], [5], [6], [10], [38], [11], [23], [26], [25], [33] and [34]. Please also see surveys in [30], [11], [22], [24] and [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system of 6 equations must be satisfied by the parameters 0 ≤ α < 1 2 , ρ m , τ m , ρ n , τ n ≥ 0, θ m , φ m , θ n , φ n ∈ . Equations ( 23) and ( 26) are determined by empirical data, (25) and (28) are determined by normalization conditions, while (24) and (27) are determined by the fact that decision-makers who are not sensitive to ambiguity should overall be indifferent between f 1 and f 2 , as well as between f 3 and f 4 . Hence, on average, half respondents are expected to prefer f 1 (f 3 ) and the other half f 2 (f 4 ).…”
Section: Data Representation In the Two-urn Examplementioning
confidence: 99%