2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): Short-term outcome, functional changes in the future liver remnant, and tumor growth activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
89
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
89
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In patient presented above, the ratio of FLR hypertrophy was 98% at 11 days, significantly higher than those reported with PVL. The higher hypertrophy ratio achieved by ALPPS procedure in the patient presented above is similar to those reported by other authors (22)(23)(24), who revealed a statistically significant increase in FLR volume after ALPPS than in patients undergoing PVE/PVL, allowing the performance of R0 resections in almost 100% of patients subjected to this new approach (25,26). Moreover, recent studies revealed that in patients who failed to achieve sufficient FLR hypertrophy after PVE, the performance of ALPPS was an effective strategy, able to induce a FLR gain which allowed subsequent R0 resection (26;27).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In patient presented above, the ratio of FLR hypertrophy was 98% at 11 days, significantly higher than those reported with PVL. The higher hypertrophy ratio achieved by ALPPS procedure in the patient presented above is similar to those reported by other authors (22)(23)(24), who revealed a statistically significant increase in FLR volume after ALPPS than in patients undergoing PVE/PVL, allowing the performance of R0 resections in almost 100% of patients subjected to this new approach (25,26). Moreover, recent studies revealed that in patients who failed to achieve sufficient FLR hypertrophy after PVE, the performance of ALPPS was an effective strategy, able to induce a FLR gain which allowed subsequent R0 resection (26;27).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A multicentric analysis revealed an 11-fold faster hypertrophy after ALPPS than after PVE (28). As hypertrophy is achieved more rapidly after ALPPS, the complete resection of the tumor could be performed in a shorter period of time, which offers some benefits: 1. the risk of disease progression between the two stages of the operation decreases (25,29); 2. the patient recovers more rapidly, decreasing the length of hospital stay (25); 3. the postoperative chemotherapy could be delivered sooner than in patients undergoing "twostage" operations (25).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se trata mayoritariamente de series pequeñas, inferiores a 50 pacientes (con varias de ellas menores de 20 casos); con excepción de una que agrupa varios centros, llegando a 202 casos (Schadde et al, 2014b) Adam et al ., 2016;Björnsson et al ., 2016b); gran parte de la cual es ≥ a grado IIIB de Clavien-Dindo (Clavien et al, 2009;Nadalin et al;Tanaka et al, 2015). Cuando se requiere realizar reconstrucciones biliares, por colangiocarcinoma hiliares, la morbilidad puede incluso ser mayor (Schnitzbauer et al; Li et al; Nadalin et al).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Pero, además, se ha reportado mortalidad tardía (posterior a los 90 días), la que puede llegar a 12,8 % Rochet et al;Lang et al;Tanaka et al, 2015;Björnsson et al, 2016b). Últimamente, se desarrolló un escore predictivo de riesgo de mortalidad postoperatorio inmediata y a 90 días, con base en un análi-sis multivariado (Linecker et al, 2016 Comparación con la hepatectomía convencional de dos etapas: Existe evidencia escasa respecto de este punto.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Tanaka has suggested that we should be cautious as functional changes in the FLR lag behind changes in volume. 8 My own opinion is that we should indeed wait longer and I suggest that surgeons should consider that a "delayed ALPPS" approach is safer: in my experience a wait time of 14 days does not increase operative difficulty and it carries with it the benefit of easy scheduling, whilst allowing the patient some time at home between stages. We also know that successful outcomes are possible with "rescue ALPPS" for patients that have previously failed to achieve adequate FLR hypertrophy with portal vein embolisation.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 91%