2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12937-020-00571-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between diet quality and food waste in Canadian families: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Background: Higher diet quality has been associated with greater amounts of food waste among adults in the United States. This study aims to build on previous work by examining the association between diet quality and food waste, as assessed using detailed waste audits, among a sample of Canadian families. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from 85 Canadian families with young children. Parent and children diet quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015), calculated from 3-da… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
33
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of publication types were included in this review, including 10 cross-sectional studies [ 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ], one review [ 68 ], two systematic reviews [ 69 , 70 ], two case studies [ 71 , 72 ], seven intervention studies (three non-randomized controlled trials [ 73 , 74 , 75 ], one randomized controlled trial [ 76 ], three pre-post-design studies [ 77 , 78 , 79 ]), one observational study [ 80 ], one comparative analysis [ 81 ], one critical evaluation [ 82 ], one time series [ 83 ], one multi-method study [ 84 ], and six food-based dietary guidelines [ 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 ]. Four main concepts were mapped from the resulting data ( Figure 3 ), and the publications were grouped into these concepts as appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A range of publication types were included in this review, including 10 cross-sectional studies [ 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ], one review [ 68 ], two systematic reviews [ 69 , 70 ], two case studies [ 71 , 72 ], seven intervention studies (three non-randomized controlled trials [ 73 , 74 , 75 ], one randomized controlled trial [ 76 ], three pre-post-design studies [ 77 , 78 , 79 ]), one observational study [ 80 ], one comparative analysis [ 81 ], one critical evaluation [ 82 ], one time series [ 83 ], one multi-method study [ 84 ], and six food-based dietary guidelines [ 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 ]. Four main concepts were mapped from the resulting data ( Figure 3 ), and the publications were grouped into these concepts as appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of studies in Concept 1 are summarized in Table 1 . Food waste measurements ranged from 107 g–422 g per capita per day, 65–110 kg per capita per year, [ 59 , 61 , 62 , 64 ], and 2.98 kg per week [ 80 ]. Six studies analyzed food waste at consumer level [ 58 , 59 , 61 , 62 , 64 , 80 ] and two studies analyzed food waste at retail and consumer levels [ 60 , 63 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations