2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2023.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers, proliferative index, and oral epithelial dysplasia: an immunohistochemical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As of today, despite recent modifications discarding the use of the term “carcinoma in-situ” in the last World Health Organization classification of oral epithelial dysplasia, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual prevails as a pivotal clinical manual that still uses “carcinoma in- situ” instead of “severe epithelial dysplasia” to characterize the earliest form of OSCC in their definition of TNM grading for the oral cavity. Moreover, we recognize that conventional two-dimensional slide evaluation may overlook critical molecular processes related to epithelial-mesenchymal interactions ( 21 , 22 ). Correspondingly, the implications of using one term over the other remain misunderstood in oral, otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery medical practices, as these two diagnoses have been previously proposed as equivalent by the World Health Organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of today, despite recent modifications discarding the use of the term “carcinoma in-situ” in the last World Health Organization classification of oral epithelial dysplasia, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual prevails as a pivotal clinical manual that still uses “carcinoma in- situ” instead of “severe epithelial dysplasia” to characterize the earliest form of OSCC in their definition of TNM grading for the oral cavity. Moreover, we recognize that conventional two-dimensional slide evaluation may overlook critical molecular processes related to epithelial-mesenchymal interactions ( 21 , 22 ). Correspondingly, the implications of using one term over the other remain misunderstood in oral, otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery medical practices, as these two diagnoses have been previously proposed as equivalent by the World Health Organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%