2021
DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.689646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between Proficiency and Efficiency in Electronic Health Records Among Pediatricians at a Major Academic Health System

Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variations in electronic health record (EHR) activity among General and Specialty pediatricians by investigating the time spent and documentation length, normalized for workload.Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of pediatric physicians using Epic EHR at a major Southeastern academic healthcare system. We collected user-level EHR activity data of 104 pediatric physicians over 91 days from April 1 to June 30, 2020.Results: Of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 75 , 93 , 94 , 113 Only one of the experimental studies was a randomized controlled trial. 75 Across both observational and experimental studies, 41 articles compared EHR use across different groups of users including comparisons by specialty (14 studies), 4 , 7 , 25 , 29 , 31 , 36 , 42 , 48 , 51 , 58 , 59 , 85 , 105 , 115 clinical role (12), 24 , 26 , 33 , 37 , 46 , 65 , 76 , 95 , 99 , 106 , 108 , 115 gender (8), 19 , 34 , 47 , 49 , 66 , 68 , 70 , 106 year in residency (8), 31 , 32 , 35 , 39 , 52 , 56 , 57 , 95 organization (3), 24 , 44 , 75 and country (1). 27 Vendor-measure studies were more likely than investigator-measure studies to make such comparisons of EHR use by user group (65% vs 25...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 75 , 93 , 94 , 113 Only one of the experimental studies was a randomized controlled trial. 75 Across both observational and experimental studies, 41 articles compared EHR use across different groups of users including comparisons by specialty (14 studies), 4 , 7 , 25 , 29 , 31 , 36 , 42 , 48 , 51 , 58 , 59 , 85 , 105 , 115 clinical role (12), 24 , 26 , 33 , 37 , 46 , 65 , 76 , 95 , 99 , 106 , 108 , 115 gender (8), 19 , 34 , 47 , 49 , 66 , 68 , 70 , 106 year in residency (8), 31 , 32 , 35 , 39 , 52 , 56 , 57 , 95 organization (3), 24 , 44 , 75 and country (1). 27 Vendor-measure studies were more likely than investigator-measure studies to make such comparisons of EHR use by user group (65% vs 25...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at specific measures of EHR use reported in each study reveals additional differences, particularly regarding durations of EHR use ( Figure 4 ). Reported time-based measures included total time in the EHR (49 articles), 3 , 4 , 19 , 24–33 , 35–49 , 51–59 , 61 , 66 , 69–73 , 77 , 79 , 95 , 98 time in notes (32 articles), 3 , 4 , 7 , 19 , 24–32 , 35–38 , 40–46 , 48 , 51 , 55–58 , 79 , 109 time in inbox (23 articles), 2–4 , 19 , 24 , 25 , 27–29 , 35–38 , 42 , 43 , 45 , 47 , 48 , 51 , 61 , 62 , 70 , 71 time in chart review (23 articles), 3 , 4 , 24–27 , 29 , 31 , 32 , 35 , 36 , 40 , 42 , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, the willingness of care providers to use technologies and the willingness and potential support of facility leadership were promising enablers of DHIs. The capacity and effective utilization of digital health among healthcare workers depend on their workload, time spent, and documentation length, indicating that the training methods should meet the healthcare providers' learning needs ( 35 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient volume was assessed using number of appointments per day (number of appointments/number of scheduled days) and number of aggregate messages received per day. Signal has measures for "efficiency" developed by Epic that have been used by prior studies to study changes in physician workflow and usage patterns [11][12][13] . We included these with the understanding that they may not correlate perfectly with actual efficiency: (1) Same day visit closure rate; (2) Physician Efficiency Profile (PEP) score, which compares time the user spent in the system and expected time in the system based on workload, calculated using all other users in the system, with a higher score indicating less time spent compared to expected 11 ; (3) Proficiency score (measures frequency of use of embedded EHR efficiency tools) [12][13] ; (4) Time (minutes) spent in notes per appointment; (5) Turnaround time (days to respond to In Basket messages); and (6) Time (minutes) spent in In Basket per day.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%