Association Between Restaurant Menu Item Descriptions and Their Nutrient Content

Krobath, Danielle M; Masters, William A.; Mueller, Megan P.

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.027

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Providing information on flavour and mouthfeel might help consumers find a product that matches their goal, which in turn prompts perceptions of variety (van Herpen and Bosmans, 2018). Furthermore, menu descriptions prompt expectations about the nutritiousness of a meal (Krobath et al. , 2021).…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is texture the new taste? The effect of sensory food descriptors on restaurant menus on visit intentions

Garaus

Weismayer

Steiner

2023

BFJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study investigates the impact of sensory food descriptors on restaurant menus on the intention to visit a restaurant and to spread positive word-of-mouth.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the signalling theory and the assimilation-contrast theory, two online experiments and one field experiment test the assumption that food descriptors prompt food-quality inferences before and after consumption, and that in both stages, food-quality inferences prompt favourable behavioural intentions.FindingsSensory food descriptors impact positively on behavioural intentions through quality inferences, although not all aspects of food quality mediate this effect.Research limitations/implicationsNot all four factors (deliciousness, visual attractiveness, variety and nutritiousness) prompt behavioural intentions to the same extent. While the signalling theory explains the positive impact of food-quality inferences on behavioural intentions before consumption, the assimilation-contrast theory explains the positive effect food-quality inferences have on the intention to revisit and word of mouth after consumption.Practical implicationsManagers should use either oral somatosensory descriptors alone, or in combination with flavour descriptors to prompt quality inferences and behavioural intentions.Originality/valueThe findings challenge the prevailing assumption that food descriptors addressing multiple senses have a superior effect on food-quality inferences compared to food descriptors stimulating only one sense. Instead, food descriptors referring to the texture, viscosity or mouthfeel of a dish, (i.e. oral somatosensory descriptors), impact on food-quality inferences, while adding flavour attributes did not have favourable effects.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Background and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%