Association Between Twitter Mention and Open-Access Status on Article Citation Metrics in the Field of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Introduction: It is possible that social media use can boost not just articles’ social impact but the number of citations and academic influence as well. If a positive correlation between Twitter usage and citation metrics exists in the ophthalmology literature, it is important to broadcast this information to the ophthalmology community so they can use Twitter to increase academic engagement with their research. There has also been an increase in the number of articles available as open access. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the presence of an open-access citation advantage in the field of ophthalmology. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between Twitter mention and open access status on citation metrics in the ophthalmology literature. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study comparing article citation metrics to Twitter mentions and open access status. We gathered data on ophthalmology research articles from the six highest-ranked ophthalmology journals published as part of a January 2019 issue. Data were collected in April 2022, 38 months after online publication. Data on citations for each article was based on Google Scholar and Scopus websites. The Altmetric Bookmarklet extension was used to determine the amount of social engagement each article received. The open-access status of each article was based on the status listed in its corresponding journal. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare social media engagement and open access status with the number of Google Scholar and Scopus citations. Results: A total of 102 original research articles were analyzed. 89 (87.3%) articles received a Twitter mention. Articles tweeted at least once had a significantly higher Google Scholar score (27.2 +/- 4) compared to articles not tweeted (16.4 +/- 1.7; 1.7-fold increase, p<0.05). Likewise, the average Scopus score was significantly higher for tweeted articles (18.6 +/- 2.6) compared to articles not tweeted (11.8 +/- 1.6; 1.6-fold increase, p<0.05). Articles listed as open access had a significantly higher number of Twitter mentions (11.8 +/- 1.8) compared to articles that were not open access (5.6 +/- 0.7; 2.1-fold increase, p<0.05). Open-access articles also had higher citation scores compared to articles that are not open access, but this relationship was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This is the first study to evaluate the relationship between article Twitter mention and citation score in the field of ophthalmology. It demonstrates a significant positive correlation between the article Twitter mention and citation score and provides further evidence that social media engagement can be beneficial to the dissemination of academic information. Further studies on the relationship between social media engagement and article dissemination are warranted in the field of ophthalmology.

Altmetric and Bibliographic Analysis of the Most Popular Articles on Vitreoretinal Surgery Between 2010 and 2020

“…Social media is a comprehensive and dynamic communication tool, and it can mediate the communication and collaboration of colleagues and scientific communities from different regions [ 13 , 14 ]. It can assist in the rapid dissemination of scientific knowledge, as well as enable discussion of a publication online and the emergence of new ideas [ 14 , 15 ]. Online communication tools are increasingly used by scientific journals, academic institutions, and scientists.…”

A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter

“…Twitter usage, particularly among professionals, has increased over the years with more organizations, individuals, and students engaging as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic [ 43 ]. Like in other fields, the powerful benefits of academic networking are present in ophthalmology, as articles tweeted at least once had a 1.7-fold increase in their Google Scholar scores [ 44 ]. This benefit can especially be exploited by open-access articles, as Twitter engagement was 2.1x higher in open-access articles compared with articles that were not open-access.…”

Social Media for Epidemiological Journals

“…Not only will such dissemination of information contribute to the advancement of public health, but it also has the potential to enhance the Journal's presence in the medical community. Several studies have shown that promoting manuscripts on Twitter increases article views and citations in various fields, such as stroke, 9 emergency medicine, 10,11 and other disciplines, [12][13][14] which can benefit the authors by increasing their research's visibility to potential readers. Twitter can be used to interact directly with authors, reviewers, and readers, facilitating more efficient communication and establishing new connections with other academic journals and researchers.…”