A n 88-year-old woman with chronic hypertension was seen in the internal/geriatric medicine outpatient clinic. She had been treated for high blood pressure (BP) for ≈20 years with a low-dose thiazide, to which an angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor had been added 5 years ago. In addition, after a possible transient ischemic attack 10 years ago, aspirin, omeprazole, and simvastatin had been added. She is known with mild cognitive impairment, which is stable with a mini-mental state examination score of 25, and a mild depression for which fluoxetine has been prescribed. In addition, she experienced 2 falls in the past 2 years; calcium/vitamin D and alendronate were started for the management of osteoporosis. On physical examination, she appears vital with a normal fluent gait and no signs of hemiparesis. Her BP is 165/75 mm Hg in the sitting position. Immediately after standing up from her chair, she feels dizzy for ≈10 seconds, but after 1 and 3 minutes, no orthostatic hypotension is found. Estimated glomerular filtration rate is 50 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 . Should antihypertensive treatment be intensified, left unaltered, or reduced?The oldest old, that is, persons aged ≥80 years, will be the fastest growing segment of the population for the next 40 years. By 2050, more than one quarter of all men and women aged ≥65 years in the Western world will be in the oldest old group.
1Despite longer life expectancy, the prevalence of various chronic diseases and functional impairment increases with age. As a result, populations of older individuals are often highly heterogeneous and individuals with same chronological age vary widely in health and functional ability. In other words, there is substantial heterogeneity in their biological age, and those at the higher end of biological age are often referred to as vulnerable or frail.BP rises with age, and ≈80% of people in Western societies aged ≥80 years have hypertension.2 Their hypertension is commonly characterized by elevated systolic BP, with often normal or even low diastolic BP. The widened pulse pressure (PP) is a reflection of increased arterial stiffness. Despite the large body of evidence in middle-aged populations, the predictive value of high BP in this rapidly growing older population is still debated, as is the question of whether hypertension should be treated, and if so, how intensively. Importantly, the current paradigm of lower is better may not apply to (untreated or treated) BP in the oldest old.In this concise narrative review, we summarize evidence from observational studies and randomized clinical trials. We conclude that biological age/frailty is becoming an important criterion for treatment decisions. Finally, we address what we think are the most pressing research questions for the coming years.
Pathophysiology of BP Regulation in the Oldest OldAlthough hypertension in the oldest old may reflect a longstanding condition, often it manifests itself as a de novo abnormality. Data from the Framingham Heart Study indicate that the majority of patient...