2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTM3 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer in a North Indian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[38][39][40][41] In a multivariate logistic analysis, we have evidenced that the GSTT1/GSTM1*0 ([ ]/ [-]) combined genotype provides a greater susceptibility for the development of spinocellular carcinoma of head and neck, similar results to those found by other authors. 7,23,42,43 Various studies could not correlate the null GSTT1 genotype with the head and neck cancer, 26,27,43 which was a result found in our study. Similarly, there was no association between this type of neoplasia and the null combined genotypes null GSTT1 and null GSTM1, as observed by Singh et al 7 On the other hand, a Chinese study has shown a correlation between the double null genotype GSTT1 and GSTM1 with nasopharynx cancer among men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…[38][39][40][41] In a multivariate logistic analysis, we have evidenced that the GSTT1/GSTM1*0 ([ ]/ [-]) combined genotype provides a greater susceptibility for the development of spinocellular carcinoma of head and neck, similar results to those found by other authors. 7,23,42,43 Various studies could not correlate the null GSTT1 genotype with the head and neck cancer, 26,27,43 which was a result found in our study. Similarly, there was no association between this type of neoplasia and the null combined genotypes null GSTT1 and null GSTM1, as observed by Singh et al 7 On the other hand, a Chinese study has shown a correlation between the double null genotype GSTT1 and GSTM1 with nasopharynx cancer among men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The GSTM1 subfamily mainly metabolizes polyaromatic hydrocarbons and the benzo-α-pyrene class of carcinogens, whereas GSTT1 is known to metabolize carcinogens like monohaloethanes and ethylene oxide [29]. In our meta-analysis, in Asians, the null genotype of GSTM1 was found to be associated with an increased CC risk, but the null genotype of GSTT1 was not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…According to the exclusion criteria, 15 articles were excluded including 5 articles containing overlapping population [7][8][9][10][11], 8 precancerous lesions included in the cases [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], 2 without sufficient data [20][21]. At last, data were available from 16 individual case-control studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], Table 1 presented characteristics of these 16 case-control studies (a total of 1,627 CC cases and 2,161 controls). 14 studies on GSTM1 polymorphism (a total of 1,514 CC cases and 1,907 controls), 12 studies on GSTT1 polymorphism (a total of 1,187 CC cases and 1,590 controls), and 6 studies on GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analysis (a total of 791 CC cases and 767controls) were included in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…however, the results are inconsistent [6][7][8] . Although there were meta-analyses reported regarding the two gene polymorphisms and cervical cancer, these were not in the context of HPV infection.…”
Section: It Is Well Known That Human Papilloma Virus (Hpv)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…21 studies of GSTM1 polymorphisms (2,250 CC cases and 3,025 controls) [6,8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] , 17 studies of GSTT1 polymorphisms (1,704 CC cases and 2,060 controls) genotypes [6, 11-13, 15-17, 20-24, 26-30] , and 9 studies of GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analyses (1,046 CC cases and 1,319 controls) [6,11,12,15,16,24,26,28] were included in our meta-analysis. The characteristics of the studies are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%