2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40122-019-0133-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations Between Headache-Free Days and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Migraine Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Survey Data in Europe

Abstract: IntroductionMigraine imposes a substantial burden on patients, society, and healthcare systems. This study aimed to assess the associations between the number of headache-free days (HFDs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with migraine in the EU5 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom).MethodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study collected survey responses from adults aged ≥ 18 y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the improvement was majorly in overall headache frequency, severest headache intensity also significantly decreased in the headache responder group. Decrease in headache frequency itself is known to lead to a significant improvement in patient quality of life 27 and based on such observations, headache frequency is also considered an important criterion in evaluating treatment success for headaches 28 . Overall, the patients with headache still had related symptoms after OA treatment but the severity and level of disability due to headaches showed a decrease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the improvement was majorly in overall headache frequency, severest headache intensity also significantly decreased in the headache responder group. Decrease in headache frequency itself is known to lead to a significant improvement in patient quality of life 27 and based on such observations, headache frequency is also considered an important criterion in evaluating treatment success for headaches 28 . Overall, the patients with headache still had related symptoms after OA treatment but the severity and level of disability due to headaches showed a decrease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An individual's self-report of such measures, including migraine frequency and severity, can elucidate the true impact of migraine on a person's quality of life and function. 14,[48][49][50][51] Moreover, patient-reported metrics are vital to understanding the efficacy of therapeutic interventions for migraine. 14,[48][49][50][51] When designing a value-based contract for migraine medications, our survey presents an innovative opportunity to work toward operationalizing the inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,[48][49][50][51] Moreover, patient-reported metrics are vital to understanding the efficacy of therapeutic interventions for migraine. 14,[48][49][50][51] When designing a value-based contract for migraine medications, our survey presents an innovative opportunity to work toward operationalizing the inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures. Operationally, one could consider collecting these data through tools such as the Headache Impact Test-6 34,48,52 or Migraine Disability Assessment, 48,53,54 both of which are validated to assess headache-related disability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the few studies that do examine the characteristics and burden of migraine using a cutoff of ≥4 monthly headache days, all outcomes are self-reported [28][29][30]. To our knowledge, no research has combined survey data with closed medical claims and closed pharmacy claims to examine the characteristics and health-related and economic burden of migraine patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normal weight (18.5 to <25.0 kg/m 2 ) 135 (30) 91 (31) 44 (28) Overweight (25 to <30.0 kg/m 2 ) 109 (24) 64 (22) 45 (28) Obese (30.0 kg/m 2 and above)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%