2019
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2533376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

astropy/photutils: v0.6

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aperture photometry of the SDSS-g and SDSS-r images was carried out using photutils (Bradley et al 2019) and calibrated against field stars in the PanSTARRS catalogue (Chambers et al 2016). The optical counterpart of 4U 1812−12 is detected in both exposures, even though it is significantly fainter in the blue filter (g = 25.3 ± 0.3) than in the red band (r = 22.76 ± 0.07).…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aperture photometry of the SDSS-g and SDSS-r images was carried out using photutils (Bradley et al 2019) and calibrated against field stars in the PanSTARRS catalogue (Chambers et al 2016). The optical counterpart of 4U 1812−12 is detected in both exposures, even though it is significantly fainter in the blue filter (g = 25.3 ± 0.3) than in the red band (r = 22.76 ± 0.07).…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dust absorption on the "blue" filter data was estimated by subtracting a model of the stellar emission. We attempted to calculate the stellar emission model either with a functional form obtained with GAL-FIT 3 (Peng et al 2010) or with the python library photutils 4 (Bradley et al 2019), or with a linear function of the "red" filter assuming that the galaxy SED does not change much across the galaxy. For GALFIT, we first fitted a single component and increased the complexity up to three components (not including a sky background component).…”
Section: Dust Absorption From Hstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software: CASA (v4.7.2, McMullin et al 2007), ZAP (Soto et al 2016), CIGALEMC (Serra et al 2011) MAG-PHYS14 (Da Cunha et al 2008, XSPEC (Arnaud 1996), SPEX (Kaastra et al 1996), scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al 2011, GALFIT (Peng et al 2010), photutils (Bradley et al 2019)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We run forced photometry at these SN locations using a pipeline, hereafter known as the ZUDS pipeline 1 (Dhawan et al, in prep), which performs aperture photometry using the Astropy affiliated package PhotUtils (Bradley et al 2019), using a six pixel diameter aperture on the difference images. The reference images for the difference images are constructed by co-adding exposures from epochs at least 30 days or more before the initial estimate of the time of maximum from the alert photometry, using the software SWARP (Bertin 2010).…”
Section: Data Processing Of the Transient Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…software: Numpy (van der Walt et al 2011), Astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al 2013, sncosmo (Barbary et al 2016), PhotUtils (Bradley et al 2019), ZTFQuery (Rigault 2018), SWARP (Bertin 2010), HOTPANTS (Becker 2015), ZUDS, fringez (Medford et al 2021), LAMBDAR Wright et al (2016), Prospector (Leja et al 2017), emcee (Foreman-Mackey et al 2013, pygtc (Bocquet & Carter 2016), matplotlib (Hunter 2007), IPAC forced Photometry Service.…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%