At Your Service

Abstract

DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

“I’d like an Explanation for That!”Exploring Reactions to Unexpected Autonomous Driving

“…We conducted a web search to identify real life experiences of unexpected autonomous driving, preferably from users that use autonomous vehicles regularly and in everyday situations. We searched for experience reports using the following keywords on Google and YouTube: "Driving in an autonomous vehicle", "Waymo annoying" 4 , "autonomous vehicle annoying", "Tesla error" 5 , "autonomous driving strange" and "self driving vehicle anecdote". Only results that reflect a real life experience with autonomous vehicles were considered.…”

“…• An indication of confidence of the vehicle in the driving decision [23] • Retrievable information from the environment (for example through smart infrastructure or connected cars) and from the vehicle system (for example detected vehicles by the vehicle) [58,59] • Change characters of vehicle information system [4] • Navigation interface that indicates future driving path [51] • Internal vehicle status about possible errors or service information Their concrete implementation could be assessed in user-centric research processes as presented in [17].…”

What If Your Car Would Care? Exploring Use Cases For Affective Automotive User Interfaces

“…Twentytwo participants had children under the age of 16 and none of them had previous experiences with emotion detection technology. All participants considered themselves technology-savvy 5 and a vast majority stated they identified well with the culture that was publicly lived in their respective home country. Driving experience was well dispersed with 14% of occasional drivers (<10,000 km/year), 56% of moderately frequent drivers (10,000-20,000 km/year) and 31% of frequent drivers (>20,000 km/year).…”

“…Furthermore, the user sample in China was younger and drove more luxurious cars than the sample in Germany, which at a first glance might seem imbalanced but represents the market segmentation in these two countries quite well [42]. While we cannot evaluate effects of emotional interaction on driving safety with our setup, we know from previous work that interactive elements are most often used in low demand driving situations [5]. In this study, we exclusively focus on which use cases can improve the driver's user experience.…”

“…Sampled drivers owned cars by Audi, BMW, Cadillac, Infiniti, Land Rover, Lexus, Maserati, Mercedes, Mini, Porsche, Tesla and/or Volvo5 Based on a 4-item self-report questionnaire on technical affinity…”