C oronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a powerful noninvasive technique that can be used to visualize the presence, extent, and severity of both noncalcified and calcified plaque. When compared with other noninvasive imaging approaches, coronary CTA has the highest sensitivity to detect anatomic stenosis and, consequently, the highest negative predictive value to exclude obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).1 However, once a coronary stenosis is identified, a limitation of CTA-which is equally problematic for invasive coronary angiography-is that the physiological consequences associated with those stenoses cannot be determined with any degree of accuracy.2,3 On the other hand, the presence and severity of ischemia are essential for understanding the pathophysiology of patient's symptoms and determining the potential role of coronary revascularization. Consequently, multiple techniques have been introduced to harness physiological data from CTA and infer whether a stenosis is hemodynamically significant. Some investigators have applied computational fluid dynamic modeling to estimate coronary pressure gradients and calculation of the fractional flow reserve across stenosis. 4 Others have relied on the use of iodinated contrast at rest and during pharmacological stress to assess myocardial perfusion (computed tomography [CT] perfusion) 5 in a similar manner to radionuclide scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging-based myocardial perfusion techniques. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that in carefully selected patients, these techniques can provide useful information to understand the physiological significance of stenoses.6-9 So, it is clear that the paradigm of isolated stenosis quantification with angiography (noninvasive or invasive) has provided insufficient and, sometimes, misleading information for diagnosis and management of CAD. However, there is limited data addressing the question of whether a more complete quantification of the atherosclerotic burden with coronary CTA, including all stenosis dimensions and other plaque characteristics, can improve discrimination of flow-limiting lesions.
See Article by Dey et alIn this issue of Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, Dey et al 10 evaluated the quantitative relationship between stenosis dimensions and x-ray-based characteristics of coronary plaques and myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve (CFR)-a validated measure of the functional severity of coronary stenosis. The study included 51 symptomatic patients with known or suspected CAD undergoing vasodilator stress positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging followed by coronary CTA on an integrated PET/CT system. Coronary flow reserve was calculated as the ratio of myocardial blood flow (in mL/min/g) during vasodilator stress over that at rest. Total coronary plaque volume and burden (plaque volume index by vessel volume), percent stenosis, plaque length, vessel remodeling, and x-ray-based plaque characteristics (calcified and noncalcified) were also...