2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00456-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons near New England coastal waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
53
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated CR PAHs values were quite different based on previously reported data from different regions (Table S9) (Golomb et al, 2001;Bodnár and Hlavay, 2005;Gigliotti et al, 2005). Two factors possibly contributed to these differences.…”
Section: Implications For Regional Variability Of Pollutant Removal Cmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calculated CR PAHs values were quite different based on previously reported data from different regions (Table S9) (Golomb et al, 2001;Bodnár and Hlavay, 2005;Gigliotti et al, 2005). Two factors possibly contributed to these differences.…”
Section: Implications For Regional Variability Of Pollutant Removal Cmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…For example, due to different dry deposition fluxes (430, 220, and 38 mg m À2 yr À1 for Jersey City, New Brunswick, and Tuckerton, respectively), higher CR PAHs value occurred in Tuckerton (0.69), but lower values appeared in Jersey City (0.27) and New Brunswick (0.26), although these three areas had similar wet deposition fluxes (76, 160 and 84 mg m À2 yr À1 ) for Jersey City, New Brunswick and Tuckerton (Gigliotti et al, 2005). Golomb et al (2001) showed that different dry deposition fluxes of PAHs among different regions were mainly associated with different types of source inputs and emission amounts, e.g., the much higher F dry value in Nahant than that in Wolfs Neck (Table S9) was likely due to higher emissions of PAHs from civil aircraft and automobile exhausts (Golomb et al, 2001). Therefore, the CR value of PAHs in a region could be improved through increasing the precipitation amounts and decreasing emissions.…”
Section: Implications For Regional Variability Of Pollutant Removal Cmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We assume those fluxes in the sampling location comparable to those of Wolf Neck (a peninsula jutting about 4 km into Casco Bay) measured by Golomb et al (2001). From their data, total atmospheric deposition flux of PAHs in the sampling location are estimated to be 30 ng cm -1 year -1 (10 ng cm -1 year -1 for dry and 20 ng cm -1 year -1 for wet deposition, assuming annual precipitation amount of 1900 mm in our sampling location) which is less than the total deposition flux of PAHs (74 ng cm -2 year -1 on average, particles, humic substances, crustal materials) must be considered as another source of PAHs (Hoffman et al, 1984;Su et al, 1998;Wakeham et al, 1980;Yang, 2000).…”
Section: Seasonal Variation Mechanisms Of the Fluxes Of Pahsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once in the atmosphere, PAH may remain in the gas phase or associate to particles (Gustafson and Dickhut, 1997;Park et al, 2001;Simcik et al, 1998), be degraded by direct and/or indirect photolysis (Masclet et al, 1986;Wang et al, 2011a), and be deposited by wet and dry processes (Golomb et al, 2001;Halsall et al, 2001;Dickhut and Gustafson, 1995). Deposited PAHs may re-volatilize, be transported over long distances and be deposited again on soil and water surfaces far from the emission sources (Fernández et al, 2003), e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurements of the atmospheric deposition of these pollutants have mostly been performed in industrial/urban areas (Halsall et al, 1997;Franz et al, 1998;Golomb et al, 2001;Park et al, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%