2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric levels and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) bound to PM 2.5 in Guangzhou, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
7
53
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The total average PAH concentrations (0.21-8.08 ng m -3 ) in PM 2.5 were close to those measured by Kume et al (2007) in Shizuoka, Japan (1.0-8.4 ng m -3 ), by Li et al (2009) in Atlanta, USA (3.16 ng m -3 ), by Martellini et al (2012) in Tuscany, Italy (5.52 ng m -3 ), by in Sanya, China (3.8-9.9 ng m -3 ), by Callén et al (2014) in Zaragoza, Spain (1.31-2.84 ng m -3 ), by Odabasi, et al (2015) in Izmir, Turkey (8.3 ng m -3 ), and by Oliveira et al (2016) in Portugal (1.45-4.23 ng m -3 ). Moreover, the total average PAH concentrations in this study were substantially lower than those reported earlier by numerous researchers such as Li et al (2005) in Guangzhou, China (15.8-84.8 ng m -3 ); Wu et al (2014) in Ordos, China (68.8 ng m -3 ); Krugly et al (2014) in Kaunas, Lithuania (20.3-131 ng m -3 ); Zhu et al (2015) in Jinan, China (30.8-140 ng m -3 ); and Liu et al (2015) in Guangzhou, China (33.9 ng m -3 ). The aforementioned studies had focused on PM 2.5 , not total suspend particles (TSPs).…”
Section: Pah Mass Concentrations Of Pm 25 In Relation To Seasonal Chcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The total average PAH concentrations (0.21-8.08 ng m -3 ) in PM 2.5 were close to those measured by Kume et al (2007) in Shizuoka, Japan (1.0-8.4 ng m -3 ), by Li et al (2009) in Atlanta, USA (3.16 ng m -3 ), by Martellini et al (2012) in Tuscany, Italy (5.52 ng m -3 ), by in Sanya, China (3.8-9.9 ng m -3 ), by Callén et al (2014) in Zaragoza, Spain (1.31-2.84 ng m -3 ), by Odabasi, et al (2015) in Izmir, Turkey (8.3 ng m -3 ), and by Oliveira et al (2016) in Portugal (1.45-4.23 ng m -3 ). Moreover, the total average PAH concentrations in this study were substantially lower than those reported earlier by numerous researchers such as Li et al (2005) in Guangzhou, China (15.8-84.8 ng m -3 ); Wu et al (2014) in Ordos, China (68.8 ng m -3 ); Krugly et al (2014) in Kaunas, Lithuania (20.3-131 ng m -3 ); Zhu et al (2015) in Jinan, China (30.8-140 ng m -3 ); and Liu et al (2015) in Guangzhou, China (33.9 ng m -3 ). The aforementioned studies had focused on PM 2.5 , not total suspend particles (TSPs).…”
Section: Pah Mass Concentrations Of Pm 25 In Relation To Seasonal Chcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Similar dominant compounds were found in different cities (Xi'an, Jinan, Beijing) of China (Bandowe et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2011c). The average 24 h total PAH concentration (97 ng m −3 ) in this study was higher than the average value reported for Guangzhou in the south of China (average 45.5 ng m −3 , from Liu et al, 2015); however, it was lower than average values reported for Xi'an in winter (range 14-701 ng m −3 ; average 206 ng m −3 from Wang et al, 2006) and in the suburbs of Beijing in winter (average 277 ng m −3 , from Feng et al, 2005). Our average value (97 ng m −3 ) was comparable to the reported values in a recent study (Feng et al, 2019) at the campus of Peking University Health Science Center, a short distance from our sampling site (∼ 1 mile), where the authors reported a total PAH average concentration in winter Beijing (2014-2015) of 88.6 ± 75 ng m −3 .…”
Section: Data Analysis and Error Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The values found in Guadalajara were approximately one order of magnitude lower than those recently reported (4.05 ng·m −3 ) in Cuernavaca, Mexico [23]. Similar levels were found in Florence, Italy (0.34-0.79 ng·m −3 ) [36], Hamilton, Canada (0.84 ng·m −3 ) [37] and Nanjing, China (0.42-1.35 ng·m −3 ) [31], while higher levels were obtained in Xi'an (2-64 ng·m −3 ) and Guangzhou (0.96-22.46 ng·m −3 ), China [38,39]. Among those 14 HAPs, five carcinogenic compounds (C-HAPs), including BaA, BbF, BkF, BaP, and IcdP, accounted for more than 50%.…”
Section: Health Riskssupporting
confidence: 71%