Attention Allocation to Financial Information: The Role of Color and Impulsivity Personality Trait

Abstract

Background In order to raise the level of investor’s protection, the European Commission has recently introduced the key investor information document (KIID), a standard, plainly worded, and consumer-friendly document which should provide individuals with essential information for their investment decisions. KIID layout has been delineated relying on results from focus groups, surveys and telephone interviews, ignoring the reliable, and unbiased insights offered by neuroscientific approaches. Aim The current study aims to elucidate the patterns of eye movements in the early phases of information acquisition during the reading of financial disclosure documents, disentangling the independent role of color and impulsivity at modulating attention distribution toward the different sources of financial information. Materials and Methods Oculomotor behavior was monitored in eighty-one healthy adults through the eye tracking technology (SMI REDn Scientific 60 Hz). An ecological protocol exploiting KIIDs was developed to control for several individual variables, through delivering standard visual stimuli based on official financial documents. Participants performed a passive exploration task (with the only specific instruction of visually exploring the document), followed by an active task where they were asked to rate the financial attractiveness of the products, as low, medium or high. The Barratt impulsiveness scale (BIS-11) was administered to each participant, to score such personality trait. Results Attention distribution over the different information sources, included in the KIIDs, has been quantified and found to be independently modulated by both color and impulsivity, with a greater role of the former over the latter. The addition of either red or blue information to some KIID’s sections increases attention allocation toward the whole document, compared to the usual black and white version. BIS-11 total scores were inversely related to the first and average fixation duration in the neutral, though not in the colored condition. Discussion Bottom-up, stimulus-related mechanisms of attention allocation influence information acquisition during the reading of financial prospectuses to the point that the increased attention induced by color compensates for individual impulsivity. Such evidence should be considered by regulators when devising the disclosure documents in order to increase investors’ protection.

Exploring the relationships between perception of product quality, product ratings, and consumers’ personality traits: An eye-tracking study.

“…The exclusion criteria affected those with (a) color blindness, (b) impaired visual acuity in any eye, (c) strabismus, (d) any other acute or chronic eye disease, and (e) calibration score below the acceptance threshold. This sample size and the sampling among college students is in line with other eyetracking studies conducted in neuromarketing and neuroeconomics (Ceravolo et al, 2019;Luan et al, 2016;Mou & Shin, 2018;Wang et al, 2014). In order to rule out visual acuity impairment or color blindness, the researchers ascertained that subject had undergone at least one ophthalmology appointment in their life.…”

Improving Debt Literacy by 2/3 Through Four Simple Infographics Requires Numeracy and Not Focusing on Negatives of Debt

“…The methodological paradigm of studies on micro-education using eye trackers can be applied to investigate educational outcomes in any subject. It is worth considering the verification of different stimuli properties, like the amount of text, the shape and color of the objects and the background (Ceravolo et al, 2019 ).…”

Socially responsible investment strategies for the transition towards sustainable development: the importance of integrating and communicating ESG

“…This is a public, standard, plainly worded and consumer-friendly document, which provides essential information for supporting the investment decision-making. KIID also discloses a product's riskiness using a summary risk indicator, its potential performance, defining a performance and costs scenario, using specific cost indicators (Ceravolo et al , 2019). The analysis of the KIIDs supports investors to identify and assess the effective integration of the ESG criteria in the different asset management activities.…”