2009
DOI: 10.1037/a0016685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention training in individuals with generalized social phobia: A randomized controlled trial.

Abstract: We conducted a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to examine the efficacy of an attention training procedure in reducing symptoms of social anxiety in forty-four individuals diagnosed with Generalized Social Phobia (GSP). Attention training comprised a probe detection task where pictures of faces with either a threatening or neutral emotional expression cued different locations on the computer screen. In the Attention Modification Program (AMP), participants responded to a probe that always foll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

18
415
8
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 396 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
18
415
8
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, regarding cognitive models of Social Phobia, the present data support the idea that selective attention to threatening social stimuli is causally involved in the maintenance of social anxiety (e.g., Amir et al, 2008;Amir et al, 2009;Schmidt et al, 2009). Indeed, these findings bolster the argument that, rather than being a by-product of social phobia, selective attention bias has a causal role in the maintenance of this disorder (Clark, 2001;Clark & Wells, 1995;Rapee & Heimberg, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, regarding cognitive models of Social Phobia, the present data support the idea that selective attention to threatening social stimuli is causally involved in the maintenance of social anxiety (e.g., Amir et al, 2008;Amir et al, 2009;Schmidt et al, 2009). Indeed, these findings bolster the argument that, rather than being a by-product of social phobia, selective attention bias has a causal role in the maintenance of this disorder (Clark, 2001;Clark & Wells, 1995;Rapee & Heimberg, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…More precisely, the current double-blind randomized clinical trial adds to a small but growing empirical literature revealing the efficacy of computerized attention training procedure in reducing clinical symptoms in individuals who suffers from social phobia (Amir et al, 2009Amir et al,2010, Schmidt et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual bias acquisition scores were not related to congruent biases on an affective task-switching task presenting new, non-trained stimuli. This finding seems to be in contrast with prior studies reporting transfer from dot-probe training to new stimuli presented in a spatial cueing (attention) task (Amir et al, 2009;Amir et al, 2008;Heeren et al, 2011). Furthermore, we found no evidence for transfer of individual training effects to interpretation bias.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In their study, participants were trained to attend either toward or away from threatening pictures, but training effects did not generalize to an emotional interference task measuring processes related to attention. These findings contradict earlier observations suggesting that dotprobe training effects generalize to a spatial cueing task, that is, conditions resembling the initial training task (Amir et al, 2009;Amir, Weber, Beard, Bomyea, & Taylor, 2008;Heeren, Lievens, & Philippot, 2011). Moreover, there is some evidence for transfer of ABM to memory.…”
Section: Transfer Of Single-session Abmcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…An example of an ATT protocol based on a modified version of the dot probe paradigm was developed by Amir and colleagues (Amir, Beard, Burns, & Bomyea, 2009;Amir, Beard, Taylor, Klumpp, Elias, & Burns, 2009). This ATT involved trials in which a threat-neutral or neutral-neutral stimulus pair was followed by a probe stimulus that the participant had to identify (an E or an F).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%