2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40811-3_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation Correction Synthesis for Hybrid PET-MR Scanners

Abstract: The combination of functional and anatomical imaging technologies such as Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) has shown its value in the preclinical and clinical fields. In PET/CT hybrid acquisition systems, CT-derived attenuation maps enable a more accurate PET reconstruction. However, CT provides only very limited soft-tissue contrast and exposes the patient to an additional radiation dose. In comparison, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides good soft-tissue contrast and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A way of mitigating this is to use a database of atlas patients that are separately registered. Just as in any estimation procedure the use of several independent measurements allows a more accurate estimate, which has been verified in several studies (Heckemann, Hajnal, Aljabar, Rueckert & Hammers 2006, Burgos, Cardoso, Modat, Pedemonte, Dickson, Barnes, Duncan, Atkinson, Arridge, Hutton et al 2013, Uh, Merchant, Li, Li & Hua 2014. Both how to select the atlas patients (Aljabar, Heckemann, Hammers, Hajnal & Rueckert 2009) and how to fuse the segmentations (Artaechevarria, Munoz-Barrutia & Ortiz-de-Solorzano 2009) are areas that deserve additional attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A way of mitigating this is to use a database of atlas patients that are separately registered. Just as in any estimation procedure the use of several independent measurements allows a more accurate estimate, which has been verified in several studies (Heckemann, Hajnal, Aljabar, Rueckert & Hammers 2006, Burgos, Cardoso, Modat, Pedemonte, Dickson, Barnes, Duncan, Atkinson, Arridge, Hutton et al 2013, Uh, Merchant, Li, Li & Hua 2014. Both how to select the atlas patients (Aljabar, Heckemann, Hammers, Hajnal & Rueckert 2009) and how to fuse the segmentations (Artaechevarria, Munoz-Barrutia & Ortiz-de-Solorzano 2009) are areas that deserve additional attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The same scheme was used by Burgos et al (2013 ) for pseudo-CT generation in the head region. As such, a ranking scheme is proposed whereby the similarity measure value for each transformed atlas is ranked across all atlases.…”
Section: Sdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) or ( 16 ) to perform the final segmentation step. The same local weighting atlas fusion strategy was exploited by Burgos et al for attenuation map synthesis in brain PET/MRI ( Burgos et al, 2013( Burgos et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Lnc C Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closed skull synthetic CT image was constructed from the T1-weighted iMRI image following the method described by Burgos et al [10]. The method relies on a database consisting of 6 pairs of co-registered T1-weighted MR / CT images from healthy subjects.…”
Section: Air-tissue Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%