Background: This study was undertaken in 90 ASA I patients in Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla to evaluate and compare haemodynamic response to intubation using Intubating Laryngeal Mask airway, Lightwand and Direct Laryngoscopy. Methods: Patients were divided into three groups: Group I: Direct Laryngoscopy, Group II: Lightwand, Group III: Intubating LMA. Patients were pre-medicated with midazolam, ranitidine and metoclopramide. Preoxygenation was done via a face mask for 3 mins. Fentanyl 1.5ug/kg IV was given slowly. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 1.5 mg/kg slow IV followed by rocuronium 0.4 mg/kg IV to facilitate the tracheal intubation. Propofol 0.5mg/kg IV was then given over 2 mins while patients were ventilated via face mask with 100% O2. Tracheal intubation was carried out after 2 mins according to group allocated. A well lubricated (with non anaesthetic jelly) 6.5 mm internal diameter polyvinylchloride tracheal tube for 30-50 Kg patient and a 7.0 mm internal diameter polyvinylchloride tracheal tube for 50-70 Kg patients was used, as these sizes correspond to weight adjusted ILMA sizes. Results: There was no statistical significance in haemodynaimcs among three groups. Though intragroup variations at different times were significant. Further incidence of complications in three groups highlighted no significant difference. Conclusion: Similar hemodynamic response in all the three groups indicate that choice of technique is not based on these parameters, instead examination of anatomical structures of neck is more important as deciding factor to have ease of intubation and lesser incidence of trauma during intubation.