Audit Committee and Financial Distress in the Middle East Context: Evidence of the Lebanese Financial Institutions

Abstract

International audienceThe purpose of this paper is to detect the impact of audit committee characteristics on Lebanese financially distressed and non-distressed banks. Four characteristics of the audit committee are being examined; size, composition, frequency of meeting and financial expertise. The sample includes 54 ebanese banks with fiscal years-end between 2009 and 2011. The financially distressed and non-distressed banks have been identified from bank profitability. Our Results show that the financial distress of banks has a significant negative relation with the meeting frequency of the audit committee. Hence, the evidence suggests that the meeting frequency of audit committee members is an important factor as it helps the audit committee to hinder the financial distress of the bank. Meeting frequency plays an important role to ensure audit committee effectiveness. In other words, the audit committee with frequent meetings is able to help audit committee members to ensure the integrity of financial reporting, to provide better monitoring and to review effectively the operations. The establishment decision of audit committee was adopted in 2008 and was modified in 2010 in Lebanese banks. Then, this study examines an actuality subject. Consequently, this paper represented an added value to the corporate governance in Lebanese banks and shows the importance of the audit committee impact on financial performance. Future studies concentrate on the impact of managerial dominance over the board (board composition, CEO duality and management ownership) on the independence of audit committee which may have an influence on bank performance

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Shape the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance?

“…AUDIT has a positive influence on ROA in line with research by and Salloum et al (2014). Audit Committee is a supervisory mechanism that can improve the financial performance of banking companies.…”

“…Audit Committee is a supervisory mechanism that can improve the financial performance of banking companies . Results from paper by Salloum et al (2014) is an added value to corporate governance in banking companies and demonstrates the importance of the audit committee's impact on financial performance. Audit committee size found Al-Matari et al (2012) to have a significant relationship with the performance of the company, but it went against what expected.…”

Committee on board: Does it matter? A study of Indonesian Sharia-listed firms

“…Audit committee, which includes the size and the number of frequency meeting, can have either a significant and positive impact on firm value (Kyereboah-Coleman, 2008;Siallagan & Machfoedz, 2006;Yasser, 2011) or have a significant inverse relationship with financial reporting and firm value (Abbott & Parker, 2000;Carcello & Neal, 2003;Klein, 2002;Salloum, Azzi, & Gebrayel, 2014;Wright, 1996). Further, it can also have no impact on firm value (Susanti, Rahmawati & Aryani, 2010).…”

The Relationship between Audit Committee Characteristics, Audit Firm Quality and Companies’ Profitability

“…This result shows that although there is a relationship between the two variables, the predictive power of corporate governance on companies' performance is too low to be meaningful. Salloum, et al(2014) aimed to highlight the impact of audit committee characteristics on Lebanese financially distressed and non-distressed banks. They examined four characteristics of the ISSN 1946-052X 2015 ajfa.macrothink.org 218 audit committee (i.e.…”

“…For example, Salloum, Azzi, Gebrayel (2014)found that the financial distress of banks has a significant negative relation with the meeting frequency of the audit committee. Geiger and Rama (2006) asserted that the big audit firms provide a high quality report in terms of producing lower errors compared with the non-big audit firms.…”