Auditory and speech performance in cochlear implanted ANSD children

Alzhrani, Farid; Yousef, Medhat; Almuhawas, Fida; Almutawa, Hisham

doi:10.1080/00016489.2019.1571283

Cited by 20 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The CAP in ANSD and control group was 5.61 ± 1.97 and 6.1 ± 2.14, respectively; the SIR in these groups was 2.88 ± 1.13 and 3.40 ± 1.19, respectively. 40 There were no significant differences in the outcomes between the 2 groups. Moreover, the authors also evaluated the relationship between cochlear implantation use and the age of children at the time of surgery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…Their results suggested a weak negative correlation between them (correlation coefficient was −0.24 and −0.17 for CAP and SIR, respectively). 40 However, this significant difference was only for CAP ( P = .07), but not for SIR ( P = .20). Dean et al 19 reported similar results, suggesting that children with or without ANSD might benefit from cochlear implantation if performed at an early age.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…This was in line with the findings of previous studies. 19,40 Alzhrani et al 40 revealed that both the CAP and SIR data were higher with earlier implantation. The CAP in ANSD and control group was 5.61 ± 1.97 and 6.1 ± 2.14, respectively; the SIR in these groups was 2.88 ± 1.13 and 3.40 ± 1.19, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the next phase, 25 full-text studies were evaluated for potential eligibility, of which 10 were excluded because of various reasons (7 studies did not provide data of our interest; 3 studies enrolled adult patients). Finally, 15 studies 9,20,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study for data analysis (Figure 1).…”

Section: Identification Of Eligible Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Duan

Huang

Wang

et al. 2022

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to critically assess the effect of cochlear implantation on auditory and speech performance outcomes of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). Material and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMbase, and Web of Science. The outcomes included speech recognition score, Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) score, and open-set speech perception. Results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: A total of 15 studies was included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data showed that, there were no significant differences between ANSD and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) groups in terms of speech recognition score (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI: −0.45, 0.47; P = .959),CAP (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: −0.13, 1.54; P = .098), SIR score (SMD = −0.09, 95% CI: −0.49, 0.32; P = .667), and open-set speech perception (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.05; P = .142). Sensitivity analysis by removing individual studies one at a time showed that the overall estimate and level of heterogeneity did not change substantially. Conclusion: The current evidence suggested that children with ANSD who underwent cochlear implants achieved comparable effects in auditory and speech performance as children with non-ANSD SNHL.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Identification Of Eligible Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Duan

Huang

Wang

et al. 2022

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…78,79 Given increased behavioral health problems in cerebral palsy, 80,81 the consequences of hearing loss are likely magnified. Although, cochlear implantation improves auditory and speech performances in typically developing children, 82 similar outcomes may not be achieved in cerebral palsy patients. Severity of the neurologic injury, early hearing aid fitting (and associated aural rehabilitation therapy) may influence effectiveness of rehabilitation in those with cerebral palsy.…”

mentioning

confidence: 96%

Hearing Loss Diagnosis and Early Hearing-Related Interventions in Infants With or at High Risk for Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To synthesize published evidence regarding hearing impairment diagnosis and interventions in infants with or at high risk for cerebral palsy in the first year after birth. Method: Nine databases were searched for MeSH terms up to February 2020. Included studies were published in English, enrolled infants with or at high risk for cerebral palsy, and addressed hearing evaluation/rehabilitation within the first year after birth. Quality of evidence was evaluated using RTI Item Bank and QUADAS-2. Results: Eighteen articles met inclusion criteria. Quality of the evidence ranged from low to high, revealing variability in diagnostic assessment methodologies and adherence to diagnostic schedules. Concerns for bias included lack of recognition of cerebral palsy effects and etiologies on functional hearing assessment methods and results. Two interventions (hearing aid and cochlear implantation) were identified; however, reported use was inconsistent. Interpretation: Hearing screening in infants with or at high risk for cerebral palsy requires evaluation of the entire auditory pathway preferentially using comprehensive electrophysiological panels of assessments. For infants with perinatal neural insults, pediatric neurologists are uniquely positioned to recommend adherence to systematic surveillance and comprehensive audiology assessments, regardless of comorbidities and motor impairments.

show abstract

Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: an updated systematic review

Sahwan,

Abdelsamad,

Alasfoor

et al. 2023

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Auditory and speech performance in cochlear implanted ANSD children

Cited by 20 publications

References 19 publications

Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hearing Loss Diagnosis and Early Hearing-Related Interventions in Infants With or at High Risk for Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review

Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: an updated systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About