2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13534-012-0051-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and their practical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The setup is also not as expensive and bulky as that of MEG or fMRI, and no surgery is needed, as in the case of ECoG. Hence, various paradigms for EEG-based BCIs have been developed, such as the event-related potential (ERP), steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), auditory steady-state response (ASSR), slow cortical potentials, event-related desynchronization (ERD), and event-related synchronization (ERS) [10,11,12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setup is also not as expensive and bulky as that of MEG or fMRI, and no surgery is needed, as in the case of ECoG. Hence, various paradigms for EEG-based BCIs have been developed, such as the event-related potential (ERP), steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), auditory steady-state response (ASSR), slow cortical potentials, event-related desynchronization (ERD), and event-related synchronization (ERS) [10,11,12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, daily usage of tactile BCI is hard because most people do not have tactile stimulators at home (Kaufmann et al, 2013). Thus, there has been an increasing interest towards auditory BCI (aBCI), which mainly uses auditory selective attention (Hill et al, 2004;Kanoh et al, 2008;Nijboer et al, 2008;Furdea et al, 2009;Klobassa et al, 2009;Halder et al, 2010;Schreuder et al, 2010;Higashi et al, 2011;Höhne et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2011;Schreuder et al, 2011;Höhne et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2012;Lopez-Gordo et al, 2012b;Lopez-Gordo et al, 2012a;Käthner et al, 2013;Nakamura et al, 2013;Simon et al, 2014;Kleih et al, 2015;Halder et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016;Heo et al, 2017;Kaongoen and Jo, 2017;Jalilpour and Sardouie, 2018;Ogino et al, 2019) or auditory imagery (González et al, 2019) to influence event-related potentials (ERPs) and/or auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs). ASSR is chiefly evoked by listening to amplitude-modulated (AM) tones, and its spectrum has peaks at message frequency (fm) (Picton et al, 2003;Lopez et al, 2009;Tanaka et al, 2013;Tanaka et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brain computer interface (BCI) technology could provide a good paradigm for a user to be attentively engaged in the contents that the computer provides. In BCI, one of the key components is to hook the user's current intention or perception by analyzing their EEG, so that a computer could perform what the user wants [11][12][13]. Steady state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) are brain responses that occur when a person observes flickering stimuli, and are one of the features that computers could recognize when a user observes a specific stimulus [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%