Auditory Environment Across the Life Span of Cochlear Implant Users: Insights From Data Logging

Busch, Tobias; Vanpoucke, Filiep; Wieringen, Astrid Van

doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-h-16-0162

Cited by 79 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Dies ist nicht zuletzt auf die notwendige anonymisierte Erhebung zurückzuführen. Hier, wie auch in einer unlängst erschienenen Arbeit [10] wurden die zur altersspezifischen Darstellung der Ergebnisse erforderlichen Angaben wie Implantationsdatum und Geburtsdatum auf volle Jahre gerundet. Insofern sind einer feiner aufgelösten Darstellung, ▶ Abb.…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

“…1c, Grenzen gesetzt. Busch et al [10] Die in ▶ Abb. 1 gezeigte Verteilung für das Implantationsalter weist für die Kleinkindergruppe ein Maximum auf.…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

“…Die Auswertung der sprachbehafteten Szenarien SiQ und SiN zeigt eine mediane Sprachexposition der beiden jüngsten Altersgruppen, Kleinkinder und Grundschüler, von knapp vier bis fast 5,5 h/d, Werte wie sie unlängst auch von Busch et al [10] beschrieben worden sind. Abweichungen finden sich bei allen anderen Altersgruppen Teenager bis hin zu den Senioren.…”

Section: Auswertung Von Fünf Scan-kategorienunclassified

“…Es findet sich in der vorliegenden Arbeit bei allen Altersgruppen der Erwachsenen eine um bis zu 0,8 h/d geringere Sprachexposition. Hauptursache ist hier das von Busch et al [10] gewählte cut-off-Kriterium. Lag die tägliche Tragedauer ausgehend vom Median unterhalb des anderthalbfachen Interquartilsbereichs wurde der Datensatz ausgeschlossen.…”

Section: Auswertung Von Fünf Scan-kategorienunclassified

“…Mit der 2013 erfolgten Einführung des Nucleus 6 Cochlear Implant-Systems [8] wurde erstmals das Datalogging im Cochlea-Implantat (CI)-Bereich eingeführt und wenig später auch von anderen Herstellern realisiert. Analog zur Entwicklung im Hörgerätebereich zeigte sich bislang eine eher geringe Anzahl von Arbeiten zu diesem Thema [9,10]. Allerdings sind in der CI-Versorgung die Fallzahlen verglichen mit der Hörgeräteversorgung erheblich geringer.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

Multizentrische Analyse des Nutzerverhaltens von Cochlea-Implantat-Trägern

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Diskussionunclassified

“…1c, Grenzen gesetzt. Busch et al [10] Die in ▶ Abb. 1 gezeigte Verteilung für das Implantationsalter weist für die Kleinkindergruppe ein Maximum auf.…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

Section: Auswertung Von Fünf Scan-kategorienunclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Multizentrische Analyse des Nutzerverhaltens von Cochlea-Implantat-Trägern

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Assessment of Receptive and Expressive Language Skills Among Young Children With Prelingual Single-Sided Deafness Managed With Early Cochlear Implantation

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IMPORTANCE Pediatric single-sided deafness (SSD) can seriously affect development, causing impaired spatial hearing skills, speech-language delays, and academic underachievement. Early cochlear implantation likely improves hearing-related outcomes, but its association with language development remains unclear.OBJECTIVE To investigate whether early cochlear implantation is associated with language outcomes for children with prelingual SSD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThe Cochlear Implant for Children and One Deaf Ear study was initiated in 2015 and recruited participants at 4 academic hospitals in Flanders, Belgium, through 2019. This cohort study included 3 groups of children aged 2 to 5 years: children with SSD and a cochlear implant, children with SSD without a cochlear implant, and a control group with normal hearing. Language and hearing skills were assessed 1 to 2 times per year until the age of 10 years.Study completion rates were high (82%). Data analysis was performed from October to December 2020. EXPOSURE Unilateral cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESLongitudinal vocabulary, grammar, and receptive language scores. The implanted group was hypothesized to outperform the nonimplanted group on all language tests. RESULTS During the recruitment period, 47 children with prelingual SSD without additional disabilities were identified at the participating hospitals. Fifteen of the 34 children with an intact auditory nerve received a cochlear implant (44%, convenience sample). Sixteen of the remaining children were enrolled in the SSD control group (50%). Data from 61 children (mean [SD] age at the time of enrollment, 2.08 [1.34] years; 26 girls [42%]) were included in the analysis: 15 children with SSD and a cochlear implant, 16 children with SSD without a cochlear implant, and 30 children with normal hearing. Children with SSD and a cochlear implant performed in line with their peers with normal hearing with regard to grammar. In contrast, children with SSD without a cochlear implant had worse grammar scores than the group with implants (−0.76; 95% CI, −0.31 to −1.21; P = .004) and the group with normal hearing (−0.53; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.15; P = .02). The 3 groups had similar vocabulary and receptive language abilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that early cochlear implantation is associated with normal grammar development in young children with prelingual SSD. Although further follow-up will reveal the long-term outcomes of the cochlear implant for other skills, the (continued) Key Points Question Is early cochlear implantation associated with language development in children with prelingual single-sided deafness (SSD)? Findings In this longitudinal cohort study of 61 children, children with SSD with a cochlear implant achieved significantly better scores for grammar than children with SSD without an implant (difference in score, 0.76), similar to scores for children with bilateral normal hearing. Vocabulary and receptive language scores did not differ for the 3 groups. Me...

show abstract

Cochlear Implants for Single‐Sided Deafness: Quality of Life, Daily Usage, and Duration of Deafness

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo report our experience for adults undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for single‐sided deafness (SSD).MethodsThis is a retrospective case series for adults with SSD who underwent CI between January 2013 and May 2021 at our institution. CNC and AzBio speech recognition scores, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12), datalogging, and the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)‐10 Global measure were utilized.ResultsSixty‐six adults underwent CI for SSD (median 51.3 years, range 20.0–74.3 years), and 57 (86.4%) remained device users at last follow‐up. Compared to pre‐operative performance, device users demonstrated significant improvement in speech recognition scores and achieved peak performance at six months post‐activation for CNC (8.0% increased to 45.6%, p < 0.0001) and AzBio in quiet (12.2% increased to 59.5%, p < 0.0001). THI was decreased at 6 months post‐implantation (58.1–14.6, p < 0.0001), with 77% of patients reporting improved or resolved tinnitus. Patients demonstrated improved SSQ12 scores as well as the disease‐specific CIQOL‐10 Global questionnaire. Duration of deafness was not associated with significant differences in speech recognition performance. Average daily wear time was positively associated with CNC and AzBio scores as well as post‐operative CIQOL‐10 scores.ConclusionsHerein we present the largest cohort of adult CI recipients with SSD with data on speech recognition scores, tinnitus measures, and SSQ12. Novel insights regarding the correlation of datalogging, duration of deafness, and CI‐specific quality of life (CIQOL‐10) metrics are discussed. Data continue to support CI as an efficacious treatment option for SSD.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 133:2362–2370, 2023

show abstract

Auditory Environment Across the Life Span of Cochlear Implant Users: Insights From Data Logging

Cited by 79 publications

References 82 publications

Multizentrische Analyse des Nutzerverhaltens von Cochlea-Implantat-Trägern

Multizentrische Analyse des Nutzerverhaltens von Cochlea-Implantat-Trägern

Assessment of Receptive and Expressive Language Skills Among Young Children With Prelingual Single-Sided Deafness Managed With Early Cochlear Implantation

Cochlear Implants for Single‐Sided Deafness: Quality of Life, Daily Usage, and Duration of Deafness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About