2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12974-016-0619-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmented expression of TSPO after intracerebral hemorrhage: a role in inflammation?

Abstract: BackgroundIntracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a potentially fatal stroke subtype accounting for 10–15 % of all strokes. Despite neurosurgical intervention and supportive care, the 30-day mortality rate remains 30–50 % with ICH survivors frequently displaying neurological impairment and requiring long-term assisted care. Although accumulating evidence demonstrates the role of neuroinflammation in secondary brain injury and delayed fatality after ICH, the molecular regulators of neuroinflammation remain poorly def… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
68
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
8
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have reported that expression of TSPO may be driven to resolve inflammation 31 and that it is expressed on CD206-positive cells (marker of M2) in a mouse model of neuroinflammation induced by intracerebral hemorrhage. 32 At the same time, TSPO was also co-localized with CD16/32-positive cells (a marker of M1) in this model. Thus, it can be suggested that both M1-and M2-activated cells may express TSPO and that TSPO expression may not be solely a marker of a proinflammatory reaction in the brain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies have reported that expression of TSPO may be driven to resolve inflammation 31 and that it is expressed on CD206-positive cells (marker of M2) in a mouse model of neuroinflammation induced by intracerebral hemorrhage. 32 At the same time, TSPO was also co-localized with CD16/32-positive cells (a marker of M1) in this model. Thus, it can be suggested that both M1-and M2-activated cells may express TSPO and that TSPO expression may not be solely a marker of a proinflammatory reaction in the brain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…However, our data suggest that even M2‐activated microglia/macrophages may express high levels of TSPO, which we later confirmed by TSPO and Ym1 double immunofluorescence staining. Recent studies have reported that expression of TSPO may be driven to resolve inflammation and that it is expressed on CD206‐positive cells (marker of M2) in a mouse model of neuroinflammation induced by intracerebral hemorrhage . At the same time, TSPO was also co‐localized with CD16/32‐positive cells (a marker of M1) in this model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…For example, there is a dramatic increase in inflammation and associated activation of TSPO‐expressing microglia after TBI or SCI . Moreover, it has been reported that the activated Iba1 + microglia, which present a major cellular source of TSPO, peaks 42 days post‐SCI while TSPO expression peaks within a week or 72 hours after infarction, especially in the cerebral infarction models and the brain injury models, respectively . In order to elucidate time‐dependent changes of TSPO expression after SCI in rodent models, we analyzed the gene expression of TSPO in mice at the nine days marker and 42 days marker after SCI using microarray.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a mouse model of intracranial hemorrhage, microglia exclusively expressed TSPO and in these cells CD16/32 (M1-like) or CD206 (M2-like) were evenly distributed (Bonsack et al, 2016). …”
Section: Imaging Of Microglia Activation In Tbimentioning
confidence: 99%