Empathy and the Novel 2007
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.003.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authors’ Empathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every participant was able to describe a time when they felt sympathy for one of the characters, and/or when they felt exactly what the main character was feeling. This corroborates research proposing a correlation between reading and empathy (Keen, 2007; Vermeule, 2010; Vezzali et al, 2015), echoing the relevance of character attachment for moral and social–emotional learning. A more novel finding was in the realm of perspective-taking; it involved variation in how participants “see” or “view” the narrative.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Every participant was able to describe a time when they felt sympathy for one of the characters, and/or when they felt exactly what the main character was feeling. This corroborates research proposing a correlation between reading and empathy (Keen, 2007; Vermeule, 2010; Vezzali et al, 2015), echoing the relevance of character attachment for moral and social–emotional learning. A more novel finding was in the realm of perspective-taking; it involved variation in how participants “see” or “view” the narrative.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…M. Jacobs, 2015), as well as the generation of mental images of narrative events (Kurby & Zacks, 2013). More broadly, scholars in cognitive literary studies have written about various aspects of reader engagement: the role of the imagination (Scarry, 1999), the cognitive and literary intersections of the imagination (Richardson, 2015), the theory of mind and fiction (Zunshine, 2012), the evocation of empathy (Keen, 2007), and readers’ emotional attachment to fictional characters (Vermeule, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this finding, Keen (2006) argued that nonfiction readers operate in a skeptical and investigative mode, whereas fiction readers become immersed in the lives of the characters. In short, because we mute our appraisal system when we read fiction, we are more likely to allow ourselves to feel powerfully in response to fiction than in everyday life (Carroll, 1996; Harris, 1998, 2000; Keen, 2006, 2007; Mar & Oatley, 2008; Oatley, 1999).…”
Section: Stronger Reactions To Fiction Because the “Appraisal System”...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiction is argued to be a safe arena for us to experience (and practice) our emotions: In fiction we can experience emotions without need for self-protection, and thus we can allow ourselves to feel more than we would feel in real life (Keen, 2006, 2007; Zunshine, 2006). Because we know that the tragedy on screen will not follow us into our kitchen, we can allow ourselves to feel more strongly.…”
Section: Stronger Reactions To Fiction Because Of the “Safety” Of Fic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stockwell summarises that the feelings experienced when reading are ‘fundamentally the same as authentic real-world emotions’ (2020: 183); literary emotions can thus be viewed as genuinely felt even though they are engendered through simulation. Character identification has also been explored as one of the key factors eliciting narrative empathy (Keen, 2007: 169; Oatley and Gholamain, 1987). Stockwell suggests that the more richly developed a character, the more readers will be able to ‘mind-model’ them to ‘a rich level of impersonation’ (2020: 183), and therefore, these characters are more likely to be the ones whom we feel emotions towards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%