2015
DOI: 10.1186/1939-4551-8-s1-a106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis (AIPD) triggered by intrauterine device (IUD): case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One hundred twelve articles were found to include a case report meeting our inclusion criteria 3–114 . Within these articles, 132 unique cases of AIPD were identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One hundred twelve articles were found to include a case report meeting our inclusion criteria 3–114 . Within these articles, 132 unique cases of AIPD were identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior exposure was unclear or not reported in 31 cases (23.5%). Of those with prior exposure to exogenous progesterone, 52 patients did so through oral contraceptive pills, 4 patients through intrauterine devices, 65,101,106,110 3 patients through injectables, 3,49,54 1 through topical progesterone acetate, 5 and 1 through a vaginal progesterone suppository 78 . The method of exogenous progesterone exposure was not specified in 8 cases 3,10,34,42,44,63,113 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%