1978
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19780630417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Phytoplankton Analysis by a Pattern Recognition Method

Abstract: An automated image processing and pattern recognition system was applied to the identification of the following genera exhibiting distinct differences in shape : Asterionella, Melosira, Fragilariar, Ceratium, Peridinium. The classification structure developed by a computer program was able to attribute all colonies or cells considered to the corresponding genus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Uhlmann et al (1978), a WM classification approach is proposed, where image denoising, shape feature extraction and geometrical thresholds are used for a five-class classification task. In this work, 15 WMs of each class are used for calculating the thresholds, five WMs of each class are used for testing, finally an accuracy of 100% is achieved.…”
Section: Original Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Uhlmann et al (1978), a WM classification approach is proposed, where image denoising, shape feature extraction and geometrical thresholds are used for a five-class classification task. In this work, 15 WMs of each class are used for calculating the thresholds, five WMs of each class are used for testing, finally an accuracy of 100% is achieved.…”
Section: Original Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several automatic methods have actually been developed for morphological identification. Computer vision has been used to identify phytoplankton cells and colonies (Uhlmann et al, 1978), dinoflagellates (Culverhouse et al, 1996), cyanobacteria (Walker and Kumagai, 2000) and diatoms (Fischer and Bunke, 2001) as well as zooplankton (Benfield et al, 1998). Flow cytometry has also been developed as an identification method (Dubelaar and Jonker, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1;Schiller, 1918), a synonym of P. redfieldi Bursa (Toriumi, 1980) shape and often constitutes a large portion of red tide phytoplankton in coastal areas of Japan (Adachi, 1972;Toriumi, 1979;1980), its automatic identification was chosen as the subject of this study. Experimental systems for automated identification and counting of leucocytes by image analysis were made by Prewitt and Mendelsohn (1966) and by Preston (1962), while automated identification by image analysis of phytoplankton species cultured in the laboratory was reported by Uhlmann et al (1978) and for zooplankton species by Jeffries et al (1981Jeffries et al ( , 1984.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the most important constituents of red tides are dinoflagellates and diatoms (Bainbridge, 1956;Wood, 1965). Since one of these dinoflagellates, Prorocentrurn triestinum Schiller (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%