Automated unit dose dispensing systems producing individually packaged and labelled drugs for inpatients: a systematic review

Abstract

Objectives Pharmacy automation is increasing in hospitals. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate the literature on automated unit dose dispensing systems (UDDS) producing individually packaged and labelled drugs for inpatients. Methods The search was conducted on eight electronic databases, including Scopus, Medline Ovid, and Cinahl, and limited to peer reviewed articles with English abstracts published 2000-2020. Studies were included in the review if drug dispensing was performed by an automated UDDS where individually packaged and labelled unit doses were subsequently assembled patient specifically for inpatients. All outcomes related to UDDS functionality were included with specific interest in medication safety, cost-efficiency and stock management. Outcomes were categorised and results synthesised qualitatively. Results 664 publications were screened, one article identified manually, resulting in eight included articles. Outcomes of the studies were categorised as medication administration errors (MAEs), dispensing errors, costs and cost-effectiveness. Studies showed that automated UDDS reduced significantly MAEs of inpatients compared with traditional ward stock system (WSS), especially when UDs were dispensed patient specifically by unit dose dispensing robot. Patient specific drug dispensing with automated UDDS was very accurate. Of three different automated medication systems (AMSs), patient specific AMS (psAMS) was the most cost-effective and complex AMS (cAMS) the most expensive system across all error types due to the higher additional investments and operation costs of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs). None of the studies investigated the impact on the medication management process such as efficiency, costs and stock management as primary outcome. Conclusions UDDS improved patient safety. However, automation is a costly investment and the implementation process is complex and time consuming. Further controlled studies are needed on the clinical and economical outcomes of automated UDDS to produce reliable knowledge for hospital decision makers on the cost-benefit of the investment and to support decision making.

Automated dispensing cabinets and their impact on the rate of omitted and delayed doses: A systematic review

“… 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 If omitted or delayed doses were not a measured outcome, these articles were excluded. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 Qualitative research was not included. 37 , 38 , 39 Studies only reporting on the implementation process of an ADC were excluded.…”

Exploring nurses' multitasking in clinical settings using a multimethod study

“…Similarly, hospital management should improve patient safety by developing technologies and information systems that can prevent medication errors. For example, nurses can use real-time wireless technology to scan barcodes, use automated dispensing cabinets and pump channels, and employ systems that allow real-time, non-bedside monitoring 35,36 . In addition, when planning a nurse staffing the number of nurses should be calculated with respect to multitasking.…”

Introduction of Unit-Dose Care in the 1,125 Bed Teaching Hospital: Practical Experience and Time Saving on Wards

“…19 By implementing the CLMM, errors in dispensing and administration of drugs are greatly decreased by scanning the UDDS blisters directly at the patient’s bedside. 1 This concrete example of use shows that continuously digitalised and then automated processes can enhance safety and efficiency.…”