National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1364/nfoec.2012.nm3f.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Discovery of Fiber Optic Structured Cabling Component Locations and Connectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general idea of developing IS is similar to that described in Wagner et al (2012). However, there are some significant differences.…”
Section: Identification Methods Of Cables and Connectorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general idea of developing IS is similar to that described in Wagner et al (2012). However, there are some significant differences.…”
Section: Identification Methods Of Cables and Connectorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, there are some significant differences. In Wagner et al (2012), the 9-cm monopole antenna put inside of fiber optic cable is proposed as an RFID tag antenna. Therefore, it is impossible to adapt such system into existing cable infrastructure.…”
Section: Identification Methods Of Cables and Connectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great number of different active methods using e.g. LED diodes [6], QR codes [7], augmented reality [8], or even RFID techniques [2,[9][10] were described. The cable infrastructure routing is constantly monitored in near real time, with information automatically relayed from the individual nodes to a digital mapping and management system.…”
Section: Cables and Connectors Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%