2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11280-011-0147-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic extraction of OWL ontologies from UML class diagrams: a semantics-preserving approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by Hermida et al [93] and Xu et al [94]. Similar to their works, we identify the mapping needed to transform MARTE packages.…”
Section: Expert Layermentioning
confidence: 78%
“…by Hermida et al [93] and Xu et al [94]. Similar to their works, we identify the mapping needed to transform MARTE packages.…”
Section: Expert Layermentioning
confidence: 78%
“…by Xu et al [22]. Additionally, Xu et al prove that the presented UML (class models) to OWL transformation is semantics-preserving.…”
Section: A Ontologies For Compatibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A literature survey of such approaches, performed in [16] highlights the need to handle hidden relationships, many-to-many relationships, and axioms in databases for efficient extraction of semantics from RDB. Authors in [17] demonstrate semantic equivalence of UML class diagram and ontology, with the help of a prototype. Automatic UML to ontology mapping would ease the manual step of ontology generation.…”
Section: Software Process Framework For Swasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is argued that such transformation when performed during the analysis phase of software life cycle generates SW-enabled software. Some work is ongoing for handling newer features of OWL2 during UML to ontology mapping [17].…”
Section: Software Process Framework For Swasmentioning
confidence: 99%