IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/wi.2007.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Website Comprehensibility Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Zahran et al [33], an automatic website evaluation method is a ‘software that automates the collection of interface usage data and identifies potential web problems’. In Yan et al [30], the authors have proposed a method that automatically determines the comprehensibility level of a website using a linear regression model and six categories of quantitatively computed features: information value, information credibility, the media instructional value, affective attention rating, organisation structure and usability of the website.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Zahran et al [33], an automatic website evaluation method is a ‘software that automates the collection of interface usage data and identifies potential web problems’. In Yan et al [30], the authors have proposed a method that automatically determines the comprehensibility level of a website using a linear regression model and six categories of quantitatively computed features: information value, information credibility, the media instructional value, affective attention rating, organisation structure and usability of the website.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main similarity between previous automatic methods and our method is that no respondents, either normal users or experts, are employed in both methods so the evaluation is not based on the respondents' responses to a questionnaire or their feedback while using the website. Therefore, in the next section, previous works on website evaluation that are closely related to our research are reviewed in two groups, based on the employment of human responses in the evaluation: automatic methods [14,16,26,[28][29][30] and empirical methods [5,20,24,25,83].…”
Section: Position Of This Study In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some similar studies on usability, accessibility and performance of web sites and web contents were also conducted by (Asiimwe and Lim, 2010), (Ataloglou et al, 2009), (Atterer, 2008), (Büyüközkan and Ruan, 2007), (Baker, 2009), (Bowlby, 2008), (Dragulanescu, 2002), (Fasanghari and Habibipour, 2009), (Garcia et al, 2005), (Hanapi, Latif and Masrek, 2010), (Harrison and Petrie, 2006), (Holzer and Kim, 2007), (Horan et al, 2006), (Inglesant et al, 2005), (Ivory et al, 2002), (Jati, 2008), (Jati, 2011), (Jati, 2012), (Jiang and Ji, 2014), (Katre and Gupta, 2011), (Kituyi and Anjoga, 2013), , (Liu et al, 2010), (Parajuli, 2007), (Pribeanu et al, 2010), (Rababah et al, 2013), (Sharma et al, 2008), (Soufi and Maguire, 2007), (Stowers, 2002), (Szeróvay, 2011), (Venkatesh et al, 2014), (Wangpipatwong et al, 2005), (West, 2005), (Withrow et al, 2000), (Yan et al, 2007) and give suggestions for improvements.…”
Section: Relataed Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research in this project measures start pages against a range of criteria (Yan, Zhang & Garcia, 2007). These criteria have been primarily extracted from literature examining library web pages (Schmidt, Cantallaps & dos Santos, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%