2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Available Macro Nutrient Status and their Relationship with Soil Physico-Chemical Properties of Mirzapur District of Uttar- Pradesh, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the limits suggested by (Muhr et al, 1963) [10] out of total soil samples 70.8% of the soil samples are in low nitrogen content, 16.6% of the samples are in medium range and 12.5% of the samples are in low range. Similar results were observed with (Ramana et al, 2015 and Bharteey et al, 2017) [16,2] . Based on the limits suggested by (Ramamoorthy and Bajaj, 1969) [13] out of total soil samples 54.1% of the samples are in low phosphorus range this is due to if we look at the pH of soil samples 62.5% of the samples are in alkaline in nature which caused the higher fixation of phosphorus ion by Ca, Mg and Na oxides whereas 29.1% of the samples are in medium range and 16.6% are in high range.…”
Section: Status Of Primary Macronutrientssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Based on the limits suggested by (Muhr et al, 1963) [10] out of total soil samples 70.8% of the soil samples are in low nitrogen content, 16.6% of the samples are in medium range and 12.5% of the samples are in low range. Similar results were observed with (Ramana et al, 2015 and Bharteey et al, 2017) [16,2] . Based on the limits suggested by (Ramamoorthy and Bajaj, 1969) [13] out of total soil samples 54.1% of the samples are in low phosphorus range this is due to if we look at the pH of soil samples 62.5% of the samples are in alkaline in nature which caused the higher fixation of phosphorus ion by Ca, Mg and Na oxides whereas 29.1% of the samples are in medium range and 16.6% are in high range.…”
Section: Status Of Primary Macronutrientssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The EC of soil water suspension (1:2) ranged between 0.3-0.6dSm -1 it showed a considerable variation with variation in topography of soil. On the basis of limit suggested all samples were (EC<0.45 dSm -1 ) in the range of normal category of salt content, the soil shaving soluble salt concentration in safer limit for satisfactory plant growth, similar findings were reported Bharteey et al, (2017).…”
Section: Physico-chemical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…On the basis of prescribed limits by Muhr et al (1963) it is observed that 57.5% of the soil samples were reported as low range of nitrogen content, 32.5% of the soil samples were reported as medium and 10% of the soil samples were reported as high range. The present findings are being in conformity with the observations made by Ramana et al (2015) and Bharteey et al, (2017).…”
Section: Available Status Of Primary Nutrientssupporting
confidence: 94%