Awareness, knowledge and practice of dyslipidaemia management among postgraduate primary care trainees in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

ObjectivesDyslipidaemia is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death in Malaysia. This study assessed the awareness, knowledge and practice of lipid management among primary care physicians undergoing postgraduate training in Malaysia.DesignCross sectional study.SettingPostgraduate primary care trainees in Malaysia.Participants759 postgraduate primary care trainees were approached through email or hard copy, of whom 466 responded.MethodA self-administered questionnaire was used to assess their awareness, knowledge and practice of dyslipidaemia management. The total cumulative score derived from the knowledge section was categorised into good or poor knowledge based on the median score, where a score of less than the median score was categorised as poor and a score equal to or more than the median score was categorised as good. We further examined the association between knowledge score and sociodemographic data. Associations were considered significant when p<0.05.ResultsThe response rate achieved was 61.4%. The majority (98.1%) were aware of the national lipid guideline, and 95.6% reported that they used the lipid guideline in their practice. The median knowledge score was 7 out of 10; 70.2% of respondents scored 7 or more which was considered as good knowledge. Despite the majority (95.6%) reporting use of guidelines, there was wide variation in their clinical practice whereby some did not practise based on the guidelines. There was a positive significant association between awareness and the use of the guideline with knowledge score (p<0.001). However there was no significant association between knowledge score and sociodemographic data (p>0.05).ConclusionsThe level of awareness and use of the lipid guideline among postgraduate primary care trainees was good. However, there were still gaps in their knowledge and practice which are not in accordance with standard guidelines.

Prevalence of Depression and its Associated Factors among Medical Students in International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)

“…Despite inconsistent findings on the relationship between physical exercise and depression, this activity should still be strongly encouraged among medical students as it will also bring other benefits beyond just mental health benefit. 22,23 We also found that Tahajjud prayer practiced were significantly associated with lower odds of having depression (AOR= 0.76, 95%CI=0.66-0.88, p<0.001). There was no previous study done to find the association between Tahajjud prayer and depression.…”

Prevalence and factors associated with lipid-lowering medications use for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases among Malaysians: the REDISCOVER study

“…Two main possible reasons for the underutilisation could be due to prescriber factors or individual patient factors. A Malaysian study showed that while the majority of clinicians used dyslipidaemia guidelines, there were wide variation in their practice with some clinicians did not prescribe based on the guidelines [ 41 ]. Furthermore, another study reported a high proportion of therapeutic inertia for LLM (61%), which resulted in lower odds of achieving LDL-c target [ 42 ].…”

“…Inappropriate prescriptions were also observed in a previous study in the United Kingdom where most patients were initiated on statins without global CVD risk assessments, and some overtreatment also occurred in the low-risk patients [ 43 ]. A Malaysian study reported better results where 79.7% of clinicians performed risk-scoring prior to statins prescription [ 41 ]. In order to resolve the possible knowledge gap that could have led to inappropriate LLM use, the results of this study should be conveyed to prescribers via continuous medical education programmes.…”

Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Traditional and Religious Leaders on Pre-Marital Screening for Sickle Cell Disease in Sokoto

“…In this study, overall score of <50% and ≥50% base on median score were graded as (poor and good) for knowledge and (negative and positive) for attitude and perception, respectively. 8 Data were analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 and continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to test for association as appropriate.…”