2015
DOI: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.5.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axillary lymph node metastases in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast. A rare finding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For grade 1, wide local excision is recommended; for grade 2, simple mastectomy is recommended and for grade 3, mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection is recommended [ 3 ]. Although some have indicated that lymph node involvement is uncommon and, therefore, resection is unnecessary, others have suggested that it may benefit high-grade tumors [ 2 , 7 , 8 ]. A modified radical mastectomy was performed in our patient’s case, and the patient refused adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For grade 1, wide local excision is recommended; for grade 2, simple mastectomy is recommended and for grade 3, mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection is recommended [ 3 ]. Although some have indicated that lymph node involvement is uncommon and, therefore, resection is unnecessary, others have suggested that it may benefit high-grade tumors [ 2 , 7 , 8 ]. A modified radical mastectomy was performed in our patient’s case, and the patient refused adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axillary lymph node metastases have been reported in association with ACC but are exceptionally rare . Distant metastases also are uncommon, although cases with spread to the lung, vertebrae, and liver have been reported .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our clinical review results are reported in (Table 1). Mean LRFS reported by case reports was 24 months (range 20-48) [3,4,8,[10][11][12]. Mean DFS reported by case series and retrospective series was 87.9% (range 69-100%) [2,5,[13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean DFS reported by case series and retrospective series was 87.9% (range 69-100%) [2,5,[13][14][15][16]. Mean OS reported in case reports was 30 months (range 12-84) [3,4,8,[10][11][12]. Mean 5-years OS reported in retrospective series was 89.7% [2,16,17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%