2009
DOI: 10.1186/1754-0410-3-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B meson decays

Abstract: We discuss the most important Physics thus far extracted from studies of B meson decays. Measurements of the four CP violating angles accessible in B decay are reviewed as well as direct CP violation. A detailed discussion of the measurements of the CKM elements V cb and V ub from semileptonic decays is given, and the differences between resulting values using inclusive decays versus exclusive decays is discussed. Measurements of "rare" decays are also reviewed. We point out where CP violating and rare decays … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 248 publications
(244 reference statements)
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the magnitudes of CKM matrix elements jV cd j and jV cs j are tightly constrained by CKM unitarity, semileptonic decays of D mesons provide an excellent testing ground for the new theoretical predictions. The relevance of tests using charm decays is increased by the similarity of D meson decays to those of B mesons, where QCD calculations are critical to extractions of jV ub j in exclusive B semileptonic decays [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the magnitudes of CKM matrix elements jV cd j and jV cs j are tightly constrained by CKM unitarity, semileptonic decays of D mesons provide an excellent testing ground for the new theoretical predictions. The relevance of tests using charm decays is increased by the similarity of D meson decays to those of B mesons, where QCD calculations are critical to extractions of jV ub j in exclusive B semileptonic decays [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction given in Eq. (1.1) must be compared with the current world averages [13,14], which include measurements from CLEO, BABAR, and Belle [15][16][17]. The central values of the theoretical prediction and of the HFAG average are compatible at the 1:2 level, while both the theoretical and experimental uncertainties are very similar in size (about 7%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ε K has been also measured [10,29] through the CP asymmetry between the two K L → π ∓ l ± (−) ν l decay widths, which implies Re (ε K ) = (1.654 ± 0.032) × 10 −3 , in good agreement with (21).…”
Section: Kaon Physicssupporting
confidence: 70%