2006
DOI: 10.1002/alt.20147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back to Buckeye: Clarifying an arbitrator's jurisdiction

Abstract: Looking back to this year's sole ADR‐related U.S. Supreme Court decision, Joseph T. McLaughlin, Kathleen M. Scanlon and James Clare, of New York, revisit Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v. Cardegna, and explain why it reaches further in supporting an arbitrator's jurisdiction than it initially appeared

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles