2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20164-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back to the Future: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Bioinformatics Studies on Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Abstract: From the 1970s to the present, regions of missing electron density in protein structures determined by X-ray diffraction and the characterization of the functions of these regions have suggested that not all protein regions depend on prior 3D structure to carry out function. Motivated by these observations, in early 1996 we began to use bioinformatics approaches to study these intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and IDP regions. At just about the same time, several laboratory groups began to study a colle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of disordered proteins, however, dynamical regions generally appear as missing electron density [110113]. Therefore, solution-state techniques that do not require crystallization, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and other techniques described here (Table 1), coupled within integrative structural biology methods (Table 1) are better suited to probe disordered proteins, as they can directly characterize their conformational heterogeneity.…”
Section: Methods Of Characterizing Ligand Interactions With Monomericmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of disordered proteins, however, dynamical regions generally appear as missing electron density [110113]. Therefore, solution-state techniques that do not require crystallization, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and other techniques described here (Table 1), coupled within integrative structural biology methods (Table 1) are better suited to probe disordered proteins, as they can directly characterize their conformational heterogeneity.…”
Section: Methods Of Characterizing Ligand Interactions With Monomericmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Dunker and Oldfield 111 suggested that the interaction between an IDP/IDR and its partner should not be described as induced fit where the protein is folded but can adjust its structure to fit the substrate. However, since the discovery of IDPs/IDRs, the sequence-structure paradigm has been revolutionized.…”
Section: Conformational Selection Induced Fit and Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative merits of the three main structural methods for assessing protein stability are shown in Table 2. Given the solid-state nature of protein crystallography it is often difficult to crystallize dynamic and disordered proteins, and for this reason NMR spectroscopy has been one of the main tools used to study IDPs such as p53 and CREB (Brutscher et al, 2015;Dunker & Oldfield, 2015;Mujtaba et al, 2004;Fig. 2d).…”
Section: Key Techniques For Determining Protein Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%