2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backscatter factor measurements for kilovoltage X-ray beams using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple publications have demonstrated close agreement between backscatter factors from MC calculation, measurements with radiochromic films and TLDs, and published tabulated values from IPEMB and AAPM protocols (Hewson et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2010;Nelson and Hill, 2011). Our MC simulation also confirmed this agreement in Figure 4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Multiple publications have demonstrated close agreement between backscatter factors from MC calculation, measurements with radiochromic films and TLDs, and published tabulated values from IPEMB and AAPM protocols (Hewson et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2010;Nelson and Hill, 2011). Our MC simulation also confirmed this agreement in Figure 4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Nelson and Hill (17) used two types of TLDs to measure BSFs and also performed Monte Carlo simulation of the specific beams used. They found moderate agreement, with measurements at all but one energy within 5% of AAPM and IPEM code of practice data and Monte Carlo results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors ( 3 , 6 , 17 ) have ascribed the differences between measured and code of practice values to differences in spectral distribution of local beams. However, in all of these cases, the differences are of the same order as the measurement uncertainties, so a more reasonable conclusion would be that the local factors agree with reference data within inherent uncertainties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, three LiF TLD100 per measurement were used with Harshaw 500 reader following the clinical in vivo dosimetry practice at the site. Literature indicates that the expected uncertainty of TLDs is within 3-5% [5,25]; therefore, the tolerance used in this study was 3%.…”
Section: E End To End Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%